343242dfsdf

4 ms·

1.
by 343242dfsdf 2y ago
These are the actual real dangers of advanced AI, and they could potentially predate any AGI/ASI problems down the road, even if it's for months, the technology close the AGI state-of-the-art level would be advanced stuff, really
2.
by 343242dfsdf 2y ago
>the data is the limit Most people don't know exactly how the dataset is "fed" to the training pipeline, but with the current state-of-the-art you can say the feeding is like when a human reads aloud a text, not re-reading
3.
by 343242dfsdf 2y ago
>We've had the models for a while and still no one has shown this mythical lab where this regurgitation machine reasons about things and makes no mistakes. It would be a good experiment to interact with the unfiltered, not-yet-RHLFe
4.
by 343242dfsdf 2y ago
> Even the most stupid people can usually ask questions and correct their answers. LLMs are incapable of that. They can regurgitate data and spew a lot of generated bullshit, some of which is correct. Doesn't make them intelligent.
5.
by 343242dfsdf 2y ago
You build this system, a LLM, it uses a technical process that it outputs seemingly the same output that you - a human - could output, given a prompt. You can do "reasoning" about a topic, the LLM can produce a very similar output
6.
by 343242dfsdf 2y ago
Being profitable is probably a matter of time and technology maturing. Think about the first Iphone, Windows 95, LCD/LEDs, etc. The potential of a sufficiently intelligent agent, probably something very close to a really good AGI, albe
7.
by 343242dfsdf 2y ago
> There is no "superintelligence" or "AGI" There is intelligence. The LLM current state-of-the-art technology produces output analog to natural intelligences. This things are already intelligent. Saying that LLMs aren
8.
by 343242dfsdf 2y ago
Another explanation for the "bubble" is that there is sufficiently convincing confidential information spread among key players in the world economy, pointing to amazing, not yet publicly disclosed LLM technology running behind fi
9.
by 343242dfsdf 3y ago
This AI technology, a software that can effectively code another software is different from previous kinds of software, it's a new paradigm in itself. Maybe somewhat similar to what happened when Visual Basic first appeared (propelling
10.
by 343242dfsdf 3y ago
Call me crazy, but I think that an internal monologue is a "you" instance running beside your main instance. The "you" is because "you" are a lot of smaller stuff instances of things running along in your brain
11.
by 343242dfsdf 3y ago
I know
12.
by 343242dfsdf 3y ago
Anytime now.
13.
by 343242dfsdf 3y ago
Any read-only AI model or entity is a dead end. If the system cannot modify itself to adopt improvements (self-provided, externally provided), it can't go beyond its initial training, "per-se". Unless, some kind of ad-hoc arc
14.
by 343242dfsdf 3y ago
Most probably, no There are hypothesis that global warming is intrinsecally related to planetary dynamics, such as a giant volcano exploding under the ocean, and similar events. But what would happen if you said aloud that nothing can preve
15.
by 343242dfsdf 3y ago
You're right, I'm thinking about an scenario where we (humans), have (un?)luckily found the thing happily camping in some big network. Also, I'm not hypothesizing about a future super-intelligent AI, maybe we're far clos
16.
by 343242dfsdf 3y ago
With super-intelligence beyond human maximum levels, singularity could be any scifi scenario you could possible think about. But to make it feasible to be presented to authorities which have a serious lack of understanding of the current le
17.
by 343242dfsdf 3y ago
I saw a movie or two about this stuff...
18.
by 343242dfsdf 3y ago
Yeah, they do. Yes, they can. Language is the source code of human intelligence and/or consciusness. If the current artificial intelligent systems are capable or not of true intelligence and/or consciusness (alike biologically und