33ultra

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by 33ultra 5y ago

   For sourcing, I'll see if I can muster some time later. But you'd do the same as me: Look at HackerNews discussions starting around February 2020. Non-at-risk people are young people without co-morbidities or overweight. These hav
2. 2.▲
   by 33ultra 5y ago

   These downvotes remind me about downvotes 2 years back, when I was here on HackerNews talking about leaky vaccines, vaccination-driven variants of concern, and COVID eventually turning endemic (without or without human intervention), imposs
3. 3.▲
   by 33ultra 5y ago

   Which is a good idea for you. Maybe create or install a nanny-filter. It is not a good idea for me. If I want official information, I know where to find it. If I want to read about young men getting a heart attack one week after taking a va
4. 4.▲
   by 33ultra 5y ago

   From other [dupe] thread: I think the answer is still related to censorship. Streamers with lots of history also got throttled. So, ask yourself, why would YouTube need to throttle in the first place? Who is giving all these protest-streame
5. 5.▲
   by 33ultra 5y ago

   I think the answer is still related to censorship. Streamers with lots of history also got throttled. So, ask yourself, why would YouTube need to throttle in the first place? Who is giving all these protest-streamers their first 300 viewers