2h

16 ms·

1. 211.▲
   by 2h 4y ago

   thanks for your comment. I will make sure to never comment on a thread again, unless I am a world expert on the subject.
2. 212.▲
   by 2h 4y ago

   Its not my problem to solve, that's the whole point. Its a niche enough need that it shouldn't even be part of CSS. people who have a need for it, should figure out some solution on their own, not force their complication onto the
3. 213.▲
   by 2h 4y ago

   I don't know the reason, but I don't like it. Nothing is wrong with that content, as you see its literally defined in the RFC.
4. 214.▲
   by 2h 4y ago

   this seems like something that should be left to end users to come up with a solution for. I would guess that a large percentage of web designers don't even know what this is, so adding it to the spec itself is just further bloating an
5. 215.▲
   by 2h 4y ago

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8216.html#section-4.3.1.1
6. 216.▲
   by 2h 4y ago

   I think it only impacts new accounts, because you can find older files on GitHub with that content. Not sure though.
7. 217.▲
   GitHub instantly suspends accounts based on file content(2a.pages.dev)

   4 points by 2h 4y ago|7 comments
8. 218.▲
   by 2h 4y ago

   Why cant universities fund it with their billion dollar endowments?
9. 219.▲
   by 2h 4y ago

   Code looks fine to me. Classic blame the programmer mentality. Shame on you.
10. 220.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    > 6. i am not sure if this is correct. i am not basketball fan. i just google it. why is AI talking like Kevin from the Office; why is AI "Googling" stuff?
11. 221.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    I don't even understand what you're asking here, but it sounds like you're arguing against yourself, so please continue.
12. 222.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    > Social networks could go hands off for moderation and allow plugable moderation engines that rely on domains for identity, trust, reputation Every time this has been tried, it's failed miserably, as it should. People need to be ab
13. 223.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    > 150 min/wk of aerobic exercise is the sweet spot (but push it to 40 if you can) This doesn't make sense.
14. 224.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    that fixed header takes up 21% of my viewport height. why do people do this?
15. 225.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    exactly. people using milliseconds and calling it a unix timestamp are wrong. provably wrong. so for them to dig in, or anything other than say "oh you are right, sorry", is just a waste of everyone's time. Accept that you ma
16. 226.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    here is some Go code that does the same thing: package unix import "time" // 2023-03-04 11:35:43.4859519 -0600 CST func unix_nano(nsec int64) string { return time.Unix(0, nsec).String()
17. 227.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    I fully support this. GitHub banned an account of mine with hundreds of stars, because they said I cannot have more than one free account: https://docs.github.com/site-policy/github-terms/github-term... but then
18. 228.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    OK, now name at least two public servers that use that. I will wait...
19. 229.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    > host name was leaked, but with SNI even that is gone nope, you can still see it perfectly fine: https://tlshello.agwa.name/ please don't spread misinformation.
20. 230.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    Honestly I kind of dislike the security through scaring the userbase tactic. HTTPS is wonderful, but it is not needed in all situations. For your run of the mill static site, its essentially pointless. Sure, if you are dealing with money or
21. 231.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    looks like it is closed source: https://github.com/crul-oss
22. 232.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    I would recommend avoiding making contributions on GitHub. If you want an account for search and whatnot fine, but I had an account with hundreds of stars killed. They said it was because I created a second account. I said they could delete
23. 233.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    wow. this is such a bad take, it makes me question using Age at all. > tools should not have issues that need communicating to users, and if they did they should fix them, not delegate a choice to a user. no tool is perfect, including Ag
24. 234.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    > VSCode has proved one could build hyperscale complex apps that perform well did it though? It might perform "good enough", but its still an order of magnitude worse than native solutions. the only reason to ever use Electron
25. 235.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    no Windows: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/43
26. 236.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    > Asciidoctor is actively overhauling its output I believe It's been 9 years. That is not actively by any definition of the word.
27. 237.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    > That looks like a minor issue in GitHub's stylesheet, not really an AsciiDoctor problem. AsciiDoctor is adding p elements in places where it should not. GitHub could work around this error with CSS, but they have not done so, nor
28. 238.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    I would caution anyone against using AsciiDoc. I really want to like AsciiDoc, but it has glaring issues for many years, that the developers seem to have no interest in fixing: https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor
29. 239.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    but not in the case. Things are not fine. I tried for years to bend over backward so that my code was POSIX compliant. At some point enough is enough.
30. 240.▲
    by 2h 4y ago

    Challenge accepted: https://go.dev/tour/welcome/1