2g67vupsoknn

4 ms·

1.
by 2g67vupsoknn 8y ago
TFW you blew your entire CGI budget on a car commercial
2.
by 2g67vupsoknn 9y ago
Thanks for the additional information. In any case, the claim that "no user data was collected or shared" is suspect. Users who enabled the extension and visited NBC Universal's site (and others) were sending extra HTTP heade
3.
by 2g67vupsoknn 9y ago
> Even when turned on no user data was collected or shared. This is disingenuous at best. The extension (when enabled) injects an extra HTTP header into your browser's requests to 3 specific sites[1], (at least) one of which appears
4.
by 2g67vupsoknn 9y ago
You might find this thread[1] of interest. All you have to do is drop the word "sorry", it doesn't matter if the apology actually addressed any of the concerns that were raised. FB was sorry for being "unclear". Moz
5.
by 2g67vupsoknn 9y ago
Do you agree that TechCrunch's headline (and, by extension, HN's) is misrepresenting what the apology was actually for? Regardless of if the criticism is justified, my point here is that there was no apology made for the plannin
6.
by 2g67vupsoknn 9y ago
The headline seems a bit misleading... he didn't actually apologize for the cartoon, but for the fact that some were "offended" and misunderstood his stated goals for the presentation (showing off VR and the partnership with
7.
by 2g67vupsoknn 9y ago
Sounds interesting, where can I find it?
8.
by 2g67vupsoknn 11y ago
> the request was definitely not for blanket access to all users communications, which would be blatantly illegal. Actually, this is exactly what was requested (and was eventually provided). http://www.wired.com/2013&#x2F
9.
by 2g67vupsoknn 11y ago
https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.0.html