2PetitsVerres

8 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by 2PetitsVerres 10y ago

   (nitpicking) That's correct if you take into account the skin effect when computing the cross-section area (or if you design your transmission line to avoid it. Better solution). But at 50/60 Hz, it's negligible (the "sk
2. 2.▲
   by 2PetitsVerres 10y ago

   I don't really know what are the exact regulations, but I've read the article. It says: > The rules do not apply to agriculture, which is covered by different regulations and makes up the bulk of water use in the state. Cuts in
3. 3.▲
   by 2PetitsVerres 10y ago

   It depends on what you call a "physics simulator". I don't know what they do at JAXA, but I would guess that they have at least some kind of simulator. But on thing which is difficult to avoid is to feed your simulator config
4. 4.▲
   by 2PetitsVerres 10y ago

   > Does this mean that error will compound if either the attitude or compensation are calculated or performed incorrectly? If so, is there a way to reduce that compounding, perhaps by making them more independent systems? It's more t
5. 5.▲
   by 2PetitsVerres 10y ago

   I'm don't completely agree with the fact that it's called a "software update". Reading different article about it, from what I understand, there was an initial error (software error probably triggered by an hardware