Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
27183
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
211.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
I'm pretty sure the rot was festering floridly well before the msft acquisition
212.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
If they want better than that the fork button is up and to the right.
213.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
Yeah I'm not defending the blog post as a great way to build the biggest bestest community. Clearly it isn't. But it's also pretty clear that's not the poster's priority. And that is defensible! They don't ow
214.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
Does it really matter? I don't like much of the overbearing "rust culture" but I love the language and many libraries and projects are exceptionally high quality. I also like zig, people are building cool things with it. I ha
215.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
Just the other day at the NATO summit he seemingly claimed Iran's nuclear program is so damaged they'll never be able to build a bomb. So, mission accomplished? Nothing the guy says is credible..
216.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
The real test is years in production. Over time your test suite grows when bugs are found and fixed, but not every bugfix necessarily gets a test, and it's very rare that a bugfix is exhaustively tested. Relying on the test suite as a
217.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
> Sooo.... "be more professional in your writing"? No, just more precise. It seems absurd to brand an entire community as "assholes" based on some disagreement with a blog post by one member. I suspect great GP didn&#
218.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
I used to think like that, but I don't anymore. The most important thing about a project is the people who are working on it. Successful projects are built by small teams with deep expertise pulling together on a shared mission. If the
219.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
damn forgot about ideation lmao
220.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
> Not sure if there's tooling for that though. I can recommend proptest. What you're describing is a common pattern in property-based testing which basically boils down to "comparing against an oracle". In this case,
221.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
Learnings, solutioning, synergy
222.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
I'm not sure if you're intentionally branding an entire language community that way or not but it might be less broadly offensive to tone that down. You could make a similar point by saying something like "I don't like t
223.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
No, unfortunately, because circumstances change. It was unbelievably stupid to attack Iran, and everyone involved knew this might happen, but now that it has happened it needs to be dealt with one way or the other.
224.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
The things about that picture giving me hives are 1. drill not perpendicular to the work 2. bearing cups are unsupported so the downpressure is spreading them 3. when the bit punches through it's going to mar the table. They noted glit
225.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
> if the US products fail, there's no real negative effect on the mainland United States It's even worse than that. Schedules slipping and cost overruns are good things for the manufacturer, because they can charge more on top
226.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
Initially it's unclear what the goal was. But now the goal must be opening the strait of Hormuz ASAP. There's going to be serious economic fallout if that doesn't happen[0]. It remains to be seen how realistic that goal actua
227.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
"Treat tests as annuals not perennials" "Treat tests as workers not management"
228.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
Maybe it's just filtering for the right contributors? More isn't always better ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
229.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
This is so deeply wrong . This person owes you nothing . You're accusing them of "selfishness" after they've given away thousands of hours of their time... Your entitlement is just breathtaking.
230.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
Yeah it sounds like they had a rusted out donor vehicle, so they may have been able to get the necessary numbers from it. Will be interesting to read all the details of how they went about it.
231.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
> He's not operating personally as the leader of a major project. What? So let me get this straight--if my open source project which I have given away for free becomes "major" (for some definition) then all of a sudden
232.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
> And I am sorry, but adoption and reaching critical mass is an important part of a serious programming language. Would you argue that Chez Scheme (to pick a random example) isn't a "serious programming language"? And I am
233.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
[flagged]
234.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
> For reference my 2022 Kubota tractor repeatedly had issues with the DPF / SCR system, mostly the software to enforce environmental rules. This lost us ~$20k one year due to the tractor being knocked out for a week (I was mid-cut f
235.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
Amazing! Can't wait :)
236.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
Just stomp the clutch and shut it off
237.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
Another big point of curiosity for me is registration--it clearly doesn't have a CA number plate, but there was a big red "3" on a laminated card in the spare.. what is that? How do you go about titling and registering a bran
238.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
There clearly aren't catastrophic bugs. The question is whether the artifact is maintainable over time, since clearly there's a massive amount of net new code that was not thoroughly reviewed. Give it a year or so and we'll
239.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
What would be the consequence to them if they did screw it up? Screwing up the maintainability of a project, especially a big one, doesn't necessarily have immediate consequences. The fallout could be delayed by a year or more. Also,
240.
▲
by
27183
3mo ago
The same thing happens much lower down the ladder: when you ask customers if they care about most of the things managers (or engineers) think customers care about, they don't.
More ›