27183

12 ms·

241.
by 27183 3mo ago
They usually do it by saying there's something wrong with your performance. If your technical work is unimpeachable they'll manufacture some "soft skills" issue--like saying there's something wrong with your communi
242.
by 27183 3mo ago
I have a hunch that most of the things humans do are AI-complete. Very little of it can be easily automated directly without AGI. We can achieve automation by re-orienting our workflows around machines (factory assembly lines, for example
243.
by 27183 3mo ago
It's awesome to see AGPL instead of the horrible BSL variants that have been going around.
244.
by 27183 3mo ago
> We could fix that by requiring grounding in building codes, automated reviews, etc. It's an open question whether, with all those guardrails, AI would provide any speedup.
245.
by 27183 3mo ago
> And this is something LLMs can clearly do. ... > It knew that this is a dangerous thing I should not do in real life From the ChatGPT response you linked, all I see for sure is some matches on the following patterns: drop $thing
246.
by 27183 3mo ago
> But to me it seems obvious that LLMs are not repeating patterns without comprehension and do understand what they are saying; otherwise they would not be capable of doing things they routinely do. Is it possible you're making the
247.
by 27183 3mo ago
Speaking personally, approximately one minute after a 10 digit wire transfer arrives in my account I will disappear permanently to sail the seas on my yacht. What would be the incentive to continue working? Personal finances aside, that&#x2
248.
by 27183 3mo ago
Isn't this more like an exploit which allows an attacker to send a phishing email from google's domain? They've hacked google's chatbot to send the attack vector. There's no way to justify it, google's behavi
249.
by 27183 3mo ago
This makes me crazy. When I started my career in software the focus was on security, correctness, uptime (measured in nines--remember those?), and performance. Features are important, but building a crap feature is worse than building no fe
250.
by 27183 3mo ago
And crucially, independent regulatory bodies formed the building codes [0] which govern things like minimum acceptable pitch for waste lines, size and materials selection of pipes, acceptable pressures and temperatures, etc. Engineers can
251.
by 27183 3mo ago
Given the size of the datacenter class GPUs they're running these models on, don't they need to be processing multiple tenants concurrently per GPU to extract the full potential of the hardware? I agree, shuffling the data between
252.
by 27183 3mo ago
I claim it's obviously recognizable as the entire surface of a 3-sphere projected onto 2 dimensions, and therefore is clearly an acceptable answer to the original question posed. I added some helpful and clarifying prose expounding upo
253.
by 27183 3mo ago
Yes. Here's a map of the entire world in 1 byte. Both hemispheres. The northern hemisphere is depicted above, the southern hemisphere is depicted below: : You're welcome.
254.
by 27183 3mo ago
> having the LLM vibe code itself in a loop The businesslatin name for this is Recursive Self-Improvement
255.
by 27183 3mo ago
I suspect what GP is getting at is there will be a strong incentive to implement some structural sharing across tenants to avoid redundantly storing the same tokens over and over. At least I'd be tempted to do this if I was working wit
256.
by 27183 3mo ago
¿Por qué no los dos?
257.
by 27183 3mo ago
If I had to hazard a guess, doing anything in a multi-tenant way on a GPU is going to be hard mode compared to most SaaS due to lack of memory safe tooling. I've built multi-tenant SaaS systems, and I've done a little GPU progra
258.
by 27183 4mo ago
Yeah that's entirely possible, I have no idea what their actual flight path was.
259.
by 27183 4mo ago
My only experience with a sonic boom was in D.C. a few years ago when fighters were scrambled to intercept a learjet which had depressurized and everyone onboard was unconscious. I believe it ultimately crashed somewhere in VA or WV. Anyway
260.
by 27183 4mo ago
I strongly agree. In scientific terms, we already know how to achieve 1G constant acceleration space flight. "All we need to do" from an engineering standpoint to achieve it is develop miniaturized fusion reactors and supercondu