Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
23B1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
151.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
Recognizing a work as a valuable part of an artist's oeuvre, even if it's not a seminal work, is a legitimate form of appreciation - and it doesn't have to meet cultural norms in order to be praised. "The end of the aut
152.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
Coppola has demonstrated a pattern of success in this vein so it's reasonable to believe this film will, at some point, be recognized in the same way.
153.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
"If you won't illustrate the impact of our mistake, we aren't obligated to listen to you" is peak CYA
154.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
Dear Matt, Resign.
155.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
Humans: "Hey this is bad" Tech: "Gosh we better tune our algos so these images are even MORE indistinguishable from the real thing" Evidently the road to hell is paved with novelty image generators.
156.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
parents
157.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
It's an aphorism not a longitudinal study
158.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
The best minds of our generation are being used to stalk children in order to sell their data to autocrats and monopolists. Digital Moloch.
159.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
d... dad? (I don't know about 90 days but there's pretty extensive studies on how paternal alcohol use can affect fertility, motility, and behavioral outcomes including downstream of possible epigenetic shifts. That said I think y
160.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
I genuinely hope you can see the irony in your own statement.
161.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
"This side lies more than that side" is the biggest lie both 'sides' tell you
162.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
As an American patriot who mists up when I hear The Star-Spangled Banner... UK slang, like their humor, is just objectively better.
163.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
"People just submitted it. I don't know why. They 'trust me'. Dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg.
164.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
heh.jpg
165.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
Even better.
166.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
How pedantic. Obviously it's not the smelling, it's the experiencing and the socializing and the development of taste, immersed in the qualia of meatspace.
167.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
small minds do, certainly
168.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
People in this thread will spend more time deciding if they agree or disagree with various aspects of this article, fret over some nonsense about the 'economics' of art, or paint with broad brushes a world they do not understand..
169.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
> I don't want to talk to salespeople, only product designers, developers, executives, and support staff. They are the people who make the stuff Designers and devs and makers too busy doing their jobs to bother with your arcane requ
170.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
It is ironic that this article seems to focus on the business logic, considering that is the same myopia at these AI companies. Not that physical/financial constraints are unimportant, but they often can be mitigated in other ways. Som
171.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
dominant strategy equilibrium both parties are forced to choose the worst possible option dating apps are a perfect example of how will happily disrupt one of the most vital and important aspects of society to make a buck if you're sin
172.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
Yes. Your intellectual labor to the maximum degree possible will be exploited by "AI" companies who are anything but. This is repackaging content, laundering it, and reselling it. As others have noted, IP law has lots of problems;
173.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
Ah the old "we must sacrifice the weak for the benefit of humanity" argument, where have I heard this before...
174.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
Heh, thanks.
175.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
Imagine if tech billionaires, instead of building dickships and buying single-family homes, decided to truly invest in humanity by realigning incentives in science.
176.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
AI is going to revolutionize humanity! Sam Altman is the last guy we want helping lead that revolution.
177.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
Honesty and transparency can be a brand asset to create long-term loyalty, which reduces customer churn, reduce marketing spend, etc. All it takes is founders/executive leaders who can see past top- and bottom-line.
178.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
"that simply follows on from a shift in consumer behaviour" feels hand-washy. chicken/egg of course, but the question people – especially technologists – should be asking is: is that really helping society progress? I would a
179.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
It happens everywhere in marketing, at all levels. Strippers, movie stars, ballet dancers. Anyone whose job it is to reach eyeballs and build a 'brand'. It is nigh on impossible to get a literary manager these days unless you have
180.
▲
by
23B1
2y ago
> some of these technologies may yield useful innovations. Why not just focus on the useful innovations, then?
More ›