Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
22289d
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
91.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
> Is there a scenario where pressing charges and a civil suit for corner crossing doesn't involve ill will? This is what you asked me. I think perhaps you intended to ask me something else. The answer to that question is 'yes&#
92.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
I think you're making an assumption of ill intent. That or you're relying on information that is not in the quote you just provided. Pressing charges for using a ladder to corner-cross does not by itself indicate ill intent. At le
93.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
You asked me a question, I answered it.
94.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
The Montana rancher quoted in the article seemed to have a reasonable justification for it. I can't say I fully agree with him or that I'd press charges for it but he doesn't sound like he has ill intent. People firing guns a
95.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
I came to the defense of the truth. I read the whole article and I read nothing in it that would suggest the land owners have the ill intent that many attribute to them. It seems to be an assumption people quickly jump to but it's not
96.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
You and others are attributing ill intent to the landowners that I did not read in the article. While it is true they receive that benefit from this situation, they aren't the ones who created it. They didn't decide which land to
97.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
Google can though :) The context here was comparing ChatGPT and Google.
98.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
That's awesome, it does seem to be quite good at writing code. But in that case, you can test for it's weaknesses by asking it anything recent. The models are only trained on data through X date. Ask it something after X and it wo
99.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
> ChatGPT, if asked correctly, will instead generate one perfect document based on millions of the documents Not yet. Today, ChatGPT is bad with facts. Don't rely on what it tells you. But that appears to be the future. And it sound
100.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
Once again, you don't get to decide for me what 'the problem is'. You're just framing what you want as objectively what should be. But you're incorrect to frame it that way. You want what you want. I want what i wan
101.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
You're missing why people want to live here in the first place. It's one of the most beautiful places in the world, with one of the best year-round climates in the world. If prices start going down, people will move here. For thos
102.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
Given that I know the local authorities will drag their feet and it'll take 5+ years for anything to actually be lived in and most stuff will be expensive to live in - yes. But that's already happening.
103.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
It's not a problem to me, that's the point. By saying I am a part of the problem, what you really mean is that my views are an obstacle to you getting what you want.
104.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
It's not a problem to everyone. For example, it's not a problem to many homeowners that the value of their homes keep going up and to the right. Living in California is expensive, in more ways than just housing. Not everyone can a
105.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
heh no, they don't seem related at all. Sierra and High Sierra were. otherwise it's a pretty random stroll, they don't seem to be in any order by geography or type or anything.
106.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
As a California native, I love the 10.9.5+ names. They all have meaning to me. (They're all places in California).
107.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
That's an interesting hypothesis - though one that is far from fact, that many would disagree with, and which has never been tested. As such, you might want to avoid fallaciously stating it as a certainty.
108.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
I didn't feel like writing a novel that accounted for every edge case and I knew if my comment got any traction, folks like you would show up passionately pointing out the details I omitted or glossed over. Here we are. You are correct
109.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
I was referring mostly to Ethereum and all of the smart contract chains and dapps that it spawned. I would agree what I said doesn't really apply to Bitcoin.
110.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
> "You've got to start with the customer experience and work backwards to the technology. You can't start with the technology and try to figure out where you're going to try to sell it." Crypto still hasn't
111.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
Setting emails to a long waiting period, during which you can undo them, has been a game changer for me in that regard. Too bad you can't take back words that came out of your mouth. Or many instant messages.
112.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
If this page is a demonstration of what a future without JavaScript would look like, it's an unintentional advertisement for sticking with JavaScript.
113.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
Maybe Laravel Mix made it easy to use. Or maybe I just learned it and dislike being forced to learn this new thing.
114.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
> I have no idea what niche Vite fills Using it with Laravel, it seems to fill the niche of 'Webpack was easy to use and working just fine, let's add this shiny toy and make things a lot more complicated' I love Laravel bu
115.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
> Why would I do that? Because you're trying to throw away your own trash, in my case. I don't even bother taking it out at night anymore, there are raccoons there half the time. And they do not respond well to me getting anywh
116.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
I live in an area where raccoons are common and I'd rather have the rats. Those things live off of trash too and they're scary, aggressive and dangerous. And they're rabid. Rats run from humans. Raccoons attack them. Try to g
117.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
What is shady about the fact that he likes to cook vegetables with oil and a lot of salt?
118.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
I think it's a mistake to assume anything connected to FTX or that SBF did is by default shady or criminal in nature. Like, if you found out they purchased their company toilet paper from Amazon - would that indicate some nefarious mot
119.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
I was not referring to the submitted product but to the comment above: >In general I have a concern about these types of products. All these page builder products are so far from actual programming, that I feel like there is a huge chasm
120.
▲
by
22289d
4y ago
PG would call that a sitcom startup idea[1]. Sounds nice but who actually wants or needs that? Notice the parent commenter was not speaking from a position of wanting such a product. It just seems to them that it should exist. What a produc
More ›