15155

18 ms·

421.
by 15155 10mo ago
Corporations are people and states aren't legally entitled to know the composition of a foreign corporation's membership.
422.
by 15155 10mo ago
You aren't just buying software, you're offloading liability of continued support and functionality.
423.
by 15155 10mo ago
SSDs are not faster than a DMA core.
424.
by 15155 10mo ago
The memory is in-package, not on-die - on-die would mean that the DRAM is being manufactured on the same 1-2-3-4-whatever nanometer process - DDR is much larger.
425.
by 15155 10mo ago
> remaining leadership of Venezuela does not in fact want to die for Maduro Now do this same exercise for Taiwan.
426.
by 15155 10mo ago
https://github.com/laverdet/isolated-vm https://github.com/fulcrumapp/v8-sandbox But yeah, interesting, it might not exist.
427.
by 15155 10mo ago
> Novo Nordisk has spent 41% more on shareholder enrichment (buybacks and dividends) than on R&D over the past five years. So they are good stewards of their funds and know they can't deploy as much as they have? Berkshire Hatha
428.
by 15155 10mo ago
> Traffic ticket Maybe read or ask an LLM to summarize part (a) for you? Civil penalties are in addition to the criminal ones - reading can be tough, I know.
429.
by 15155 10mo ago
> financing unskilled lawbreakers with or without immigrants So why invite more? > Also "your people" are immigrants Stop conflating legal and illegal immigrants: this strategy doesn't work as well in writing.
430.
by 15155 10mo ago
> If people are crossing the rivers and crawling through razor wire to get here then the policies make it too hard to enter the country This is an opinion. > not a criminal offense, btw https://www.law.cornell.edu/usco
431.
by 15155 10mo ago
Another artful legal vs. illegal conflation - citation needed. I have no doubt in my mind folks coming in on H-1B and O-1 visas contribute more than they take out: nobody is disputing that. When an illegal immigrant making $2/hr under
432.
by 15155 10mo ago
> You'll spend way more tax money to haul them across the border than you would to just print them a permit to live and work in the community they've been contributing to for years At the expense of legal immigrants who bothere
433.
by 15155 10mo ago
> most immigrants pay taxes because they work regular jobs Source? Or are we just talking out of our asses? "Most" means something. > And they're exempt from most social safety nets, too Emergency rooms, census, etc. al
434.
by 15155 10mo ago
> This isn't true, it's a pillar of the USA to harbor refugees and welcome immigrants. It's our entire history. It's our entire identity. All of these dreamy tales are from before the New Deal for a reason. > I don
435.
by 15155 10mo ago
Yawn. My concern goes far beyond monetary cost, given that political districts count illegal immigrants for purposes of representation (census) and that birthright citizenship exists. By encouraging illegal immigration ("sanctuary citi
436.
by 15155 10mo ago
A popular technique is to conflate illegal immigrants with legal ones for the benefit of argument. Removals of those with legal status should be corrected! I can simultaneously agree with you on this point and believe that all illegal imm
437.
by 15155 10mo ago
At that point why not just run V8 isolates, if JS is your only guest?
438.
by 15155 10mo ago
> no citizens are paid under the table? Proportionately far fewer, obviously? What? Are you going to honestly try and argue in good faith that per capita, people already breaking laws with no legal means to work are paying taxes at the s
439.
by 15155 10mo ago
Gosh golly gee, someone who decided to break the law to enter wouldn't possibly break other laws for their own benefit, would they!? I don't care if "many" people do anything: if they are here without status, they sh
440.
by 15155 10mo ago
> Good luck sweeping back the tide. $170B should make a big dent! Southern border encounters are way down: I think it's working!
441.
by 15155 10mo ago
Criminality doesn't factor into my calculus at all: if you are here without status, you will be removed. Criminal removals should be expedited, no doubt, but even visa overstays should be met with prompt deportation.
442.
by 15155 10mo ago
I don't really care, and this isn't a valid retort. Why should some be allowed to skip the line? If they are skilled, H-1B, O-1, etc. visas should be obtainable. There's no implicit right to migrate wherever one chooses regar
443.
by 15155 10mo ago
> They pay into social security when they have a job just like anyone else. Really? None are paid under the table? Who pays their ER bills when they break their arm while performing illegal farm labor, for instance? > If it's wea
444.
by 15155 10mo ago
How many engineers and doctors are wading across the Rio Grande?
445.
by 15155 10mo ago
- Keep the data centers (jobs, downstream commercial demand, etc.) - Build up manufacturing (more jobs!) Problem solved.
446.
by 15155 10mo ago
What about it is false? - Illegal immigrants make the choice to come to the United States for financial enrichment: jobs, handouts. Are you disputing this? - The United States has a notoriously weak social safety net relative to other count
447.
by 15155 10mo ago
"No empathy" - how about not wanting to fund criminal enterprises using the tax dollars of hard-working Americans? Who has empathy for them - the people financing this "charity?" Why is importing unskilled foreigners t
448.
by 15155 10mo ago
> Why do Americans want fascism? Americans don't want to expend their tax dollars on folks willing to break the law for financial gain.
449.
by 15155 10mo ago
> others consider it to be something much more serious. We have limited funds for social safety nets for our own citizens: how is it not "serious" that we would deplete them on folks who are willfully and intentionally breaking
450.
by 15155 10mo ago
Why do we need to give free stuff to every person that wades across the southern border? What is our legal or moral obligation to eviscerate our already-limited social safety net for outsiders who, by and large, do not contribute to them? Y

More ›