13years

36 ms·

481.
by 13years 5y ago
The problem is who decides. Once you create a fact checking entity, it will decide for itself what are object truths. Within a fact checking entity you essentially have the same issue as regulatory capture.
482.
by 13years 5y ago
The classic conundrum, who checks the fact checkers.
483.
by 13years 5y ago
And yet, the original source is what is required to refute any misinterpretation.
484.
by 13years 5y ago
It will always be so. The power to control information is far too tempting to not be subverted for nefarious means.
485.
by 13years 5y ago
As usual, fact checking on semantics. He has 9 patents on the technology platform on which the vaccines were built. So yes, he is probably doesn't have a credible opinion.
486.
by 13years 5y ago
"no one reads the articles that show the truth!" Which you didn't the first time you replied as your assumption was this was a debate of not vaccinating vs. just hope your natural immunity will handle it on first encounter. T
487.
by 13years 5y ago
Because it is Marc Girardot and based on your response you didn't read it anyway.
488.
by 13years 5y ago
Given the contractions that exist not only in time, but across countries etc at any given moment, I simply propose that the only sensible solution is to allow individuals to evaluate their risks for themselves and take actions accordingly.
489.
by 13years 5y ago
It is the totality of it all. Every bit of advice is usually contradicted within 3-6 months. This is a coronavirus that mutates easily. As many have suggested, it is likely here to stay. Are we going live in fear forever? Wearing masks, s
490.
by 13years 5y ago
There is a good bit of data backing up that natural immunity is likely superior. https://www.biznews.com/health/2021/06/28/covid-19-vaccine-i...
491.
by 13years 5y ago
I know, it is about the never ending saga that evolves into ever more unexpected needs/requirements that truly begin to look absurd. We are all playing a game of Simon Says.
492.
by 13years 5y ago
Don't you think it odd that you are not aware of concerns from the very person who created the technology? In case you get curious https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du2wm5nhTXY UPDATE: Whatever you do, don't look fo
493.
by 13years 5y ago
Science is not a "belief". “Religion is a culture of faith; science is a culture of doubt.” Richard Feynman. One of the greatest minds to ever exist
494.
by 13years 5y ago
How about a monthly dose? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9775925/Can-long-... The more times you take it, you are increasing your risk of an adverse reaction. Yes, nothing to worry about here. 2 Weeks
495.
by 13years 5y ago
That's not an answer to the question. You asserted there is no legitimate criticism. Which is it? Do you think there is legitimate criticism of this vaccine? Are you aware of it?
496.
by 13years 5y ago
Are you aware the the inventor of the mRNA Covid vaccines is questioning the data and studies?
497.
by 13years 5y ago
Nobody expects evil to self identify. The greatest atrocities in human history were by those who wanted to make the world a better place.
498.
by 13years 5y ago
We are not talking about vaccines other than covid. Do you think those who question vaccines are very different group of people than those who question masks and are using different methodologies to do so?
499.
by 13years 5y ago
"Disease experts say kids don't seem to be developing more severe COVID-19 cases as a result of the Delta variant " https://www.businessinsider.com/delta-variant-covid-risk-to-...
500.
by 13years 5y ago
Yes, this Joe Schmoe is the lawyer who successfully defended Wesley Snipes against the entire corrupt system of injustice and won a landmark case. He also successfully defended Ralph Nader to the supreme court. https://www.barne
501.
by 13years 5y ago
For everyone calling people idiots who have an opposing view. This is a fascinating paper on those with the opposing view. “their approach to the pandemic is grounded in more scientific rigor, not less.” https://centipedenation.c
502.
by 13years 5y ago
Exactly. This is the only way to retain a free society. This will never end. The variants are spreading now faster in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. This is not surprising. Virologists have warned us about this. However, they ha
503.
by 13years 5y ago
Are you aware of how that number is generated? Why is it exactly the opposite in other countries?
504.
by 13years 5y ago
Exactly. This is idiocy. There is already Delta-plus and other variants. It is now spreading more in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. https://fredbrownbill.wordpress.com/2021/07/20/covid-cases-e...
505.
by 13years 5y ago
The information suppression is incredible. Even the inventor of the mRNA technology Robert Malone isn't allowed to speak about concerns. Truly in an Orwellian society of tyranny.
506.
by 13years 5y ago
It is a violation of the Nuremberg code. If you work at google, you might want to send them this. Sample letter from lawyer Robert Barnes https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/689810/vaccine-mandate...
507.
by 13years 5y ago
It is interesting this article is citing a single paper as the substantial foundation of all evidence. It seems this is an overstatement of the source of evidence. https://odysee.com/@DarkHorsePodcastClips:b/ivermectin-
508.
by 13years 5y ago
> contributing to the better world that I think we need, has started to weigh heavier and heavier on me... This is the problem. We have arrived where we are because some group of people think that powerful companies "should make th
509.
by 13years 5y ago
"I heard the earth was flat only a few months ago too—it does not make either claim any more likely to be true." It is not about the validity, it is that you can not even evaluate that which you have not heard. The level of censor
510.
by 13years 5y ago
"I heard about Ivermectin for the first time this week" This is what is extremely disturbing. This result of the control of information occurring in our society. What's more, it is not just the literal control, but the socia

More ›