13years

29 ms·

391.
by 13years 4y ago
Yes, I think we are going to need a new architecture for LLMs to move beyond, "that is interesting", to something that is reliable and can be used for trusted applications.
392.
by 13years 4y ago
I think it will shortly move from hard to impossible. Not before we pour billions of dollars into it though. I can not conceive how it will ever be solvable for the bias paradox and the intelligence paradox. I've written about both of
393.
by 13years 4y ago
Yes, the hopeful AI anti-hero. Unfortunately, it will likely still be controlled by the same villains we have today.
394.
by 13years 4y ago
> Superhuman AI might just be able to spin its wheels faster Yes, I've considered that we might not achieve anything close to what is conceptually described as ASI. However, it could be for very different reasons we still encounter
395.
by 13years 4y ago
> I think intelligence is overrated I suppose you are somewhat saying that maybe there is an upper bounds that we don't perceive? There is no disproportionate difference above what genius we have already encountered within humanity?
396.
by 13years 4y ago
That is how I perceive it. Yet there are apparently lots of researchers who "think" otherwise. However, I question to what degree they have a solid theory or for what motives they push forward in the face of what would seem imposs
397.
by 13years 4y ago
Couldn't the very same example, corporations, also be perceived as control failure? We have oligopolies as well as regulatory capture that exists within government systems, lobbies, extortion and revolving door politics. They often ali
398.
by 13years 4y ago
Essentially you are suggesting that we would trick the AGI's into designing their own containment through competition?
399.
Ask HN: Is there an answer to the AGI intelligence paradox?
1 points by 13years 4y ago|15 comments
400.
by 13years 4y ago
Technology evolution looks like it may become the new rat race. By the time you plan your course of action and skills you need, it is then obsolete before you can complete.
401.
AI Singularity: The Hubris Trap(dakara.substack.com)
1 points by 13years 4y ago|0 comments
402.
by 13years 4y ago
These principles sound good, but finding basis in reality for their implementation continues to be lacking. We are faced with substantial technological risk and the best well thought out paradigm for going forward just tends to be we will f
403.
by 13years 4y ago
I've spent a lot of time thinking about this as well. I think you have some valid points. For better discussions, I'm thinking we really need to begin to differentiate AI art on the values of utility, creativity, meaning, craft an
404.
by 13years 4y ago
I've called this the rapidly shrinking innovation-disruption-adaption cycles. It quickly becomes the new rat race. "It will be unlikely we will be able to plan for the disruption as it will simply happen before anyone can reason a
405.
by 13years 4y ago
> I just hope that they don’t do so by resolving Fermi’s Paradox for us Yes, that thought has occurred to me. I've also considered that the "Singularity" might be instead of the point AI gains sentience, it is more like t
406.
by 13years 4y ago
Yes, I have called this The Bias Paradox. If a non-biased AI could actually exist, it would be perceived as biased and we would attempt to fix the non-bias resulting in injecting bias back into the system. However, the output is not pure as
407.
by 13years 4y ago
I don't think it can be regulated, except to the extent we ensure state governments and oligopolies retain total control. AI harm goes far beyond nuclear weapons in so much as it's capacity for harm contains everything for which w
408.
by 13years 4y ago
> It's not the AI we must fear, it's the people. Consider that AI in any form will somewhat be a reflection of ourselves. As AI becomes more powerful, it essentially will magnify the best and worst of humanity. So yes, when we
409.
by 13years 4y ago
It figures out "rules" within a guided set of parameters. So yes it is given direction by constructing a type of feedback on a task that it is given.
410.
by 13years 4y ago
Brings new meaning to "blue screen of death"
411.
by 13years 4y ago
Yes, it has shown that we might progress towards AGI without ever having anything that is sentient. It could be nearly imperceptible difference externally. Nonetheless, it brings forward a couple of other issues. We might never know if we h
412.
by 13years 4y ago
Yes, there is a fallacy in believing a machine will be without bias. Unfortunately this will likely lead us to misuse AI and apply it to situations it is not well suited. I've written more specifically about the bias paradox here - ht
413.
by 13years 4y ago
Yes, didn't mean to imply there is no progress, just that some perceive that we are all of a sudden getting close to AGI from their first impressions of ChatGPT.
414.
by 13years 4y ago
I think this is starting look like it is accurate. The sudden progress of AI is more of an illusion. It is more readily apparent in the field of image generation. If you stand back far enough, the images look outstanding. However, any close
415.
AI: The Bias Paradox(dakara.substack.com)
2 points by 13years 4y ago|0 comments
416.
by 13years 4y ago
Yes, it is mostly irrelevant if something is "intelligent" if the result is that it can outperform humans on any particular task. Then we can say that it is still useful. However, just as the argument that AI is not useful because
417.
by 13years 4y ago
Yes, this is the problem of the idea we can create an impartial unbiased AI. It will only lead to a specific lens of bias. We only have biased observers to monitor and tweak the system. Attempts to counter the bias that already exists in in
418.
by 13years 4y ago
I've had very similar experience. After seeing all the hype of people claiming they have written all kinds of interesting things in code with ChatGPT I gave it a try. Was never able to get it do what I wanted. It often seemed to make c
419.
by 13years 4y ago
This is something I'm trying to get a better understanding. What some have called the AI hallucination problem. Has anyone done a good deep dive and explained whether this is something likely overcome relatively soon or is it more prob
420.
by 13years 4y ago
I hope that is the case, but I am doubtful of the overall success. My reasoning being looking at the lack of success of decentralized competition of big tech for search and social media. Other than crypto currency, these other web3 attempts

More ›