12bytes

5 ms·

1.
by 12bytes 6y ago
i haven't read through all the questions asked here, but yours is perhaps the least stupid i suspect you may already know the answer to your question; of course not everyone needs to be vaccinated - that's the job of any reasonabl
2.
by 12bytes 6y ago
this wouldn't surprise me, however... proof or go home
3.
by 12bytes 6y ago
as the author of that article i obviously wouldn't disagree that there are serious problem with Moz, but my impression is that they are largely at the corporate level - the developers (at least some) seem to care far more about privacy
4.
by 12bytes 6y ago
> The website's other articles are spammy conspiracy crud anyway. provide evidence where i'm wrong and i'll be happy to correct, but rubber-stamping someones content as "spammy", whatever that means, is lazy
5.
by 12bytes 6y ago
...or globally for those that care about privacy (then allow per-host as needed)
6.
by 12bytes 6y ago
correct
7.
by 12bytes 6y ago
> Disabling Javascript and cosmetic filters doesn't make any sense. it does for those concerned with their privacy - i recommend to my readers to disable JS globally and allow it per-host where needed as for cosmetic filters, proces
8.
Mozilla showed me what the interwebs look like and now I have mad CoW disease(12bytes.org)
2 points by 12bytes 7y ago|3 comments
9.
by 12bytes 8y ago
you're painting "drugs" with a broad brush psychedelics are not like cocaine, despite what the 'gubbmunt' would like you to believe - rather they are like a window into your 'self' - if you think of psyche
10.
by 12bytes 8y ago
“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” ― Nikola Tesla
11.
Truth at Last: The Assassination of Martin Luther King (vid)(corbettreport.com)
1 points by 12bytes 9y ago|0 comments
12.
by 12bytes 9y ago
i meant no offense - i used the term "freaks" because a lot of people who don't give a crap about privacy may consider us 'privacy freaks' - sine the article is about privacy however, i think it's obvious that
13.
by 12bytes 9y ago
> NoScript Security Suite: since uMatrix will be used to block scripts, this functionality is not required from NoScript > This is a mistake. thanks for bringing this up - i couldn't quickly find info regarding how uM handles inl
14.
by 12bytes 9y ago
thanks for that - i'll look into adding that information