1123581321

3 ms·

1.
by 1123581321 5d ago
I don't think it's equivalent because it's paperwork they now have to think about, they're wondering if it's wiping away old employment promises or systems, did everyone get one of these offers, etc. Definitely see
2.
by 1123581321 5d ago
I think that last point is opposite; it’s seen as heartless when the new owner of a business goes through rehiring existing employees instead of assuring them they still have a job.
3.
by 1123581321 7d ago
Individual tax rates would be set much higher if they were calculated based on personal budget surplus. The personal tax prep burden would be unbearable without cheating or taking a statutory amount of personal expenses, which is essentiall
4.
by 1123581321 7d ago
Sounds like you could go to a different shop right now, that stands out for its ice cream instead of its signs. :)
5.
by 1123581321 8d ago
It depends. There are hidden limits in GitHub’s gql. Some will time out above certain quantities and it’s not documented, which probably means it’s a significant server strain to serve the successful responses. I find I have to maintain a t
6.
by 1123581321 16d ago
I'm not the OP, but my understanding (and I agree) is that it can seem like a better value when a subset of factors are considered (ones that IT can measure, biases in IT against Apple etc.) and it leads the company into making a choic
7.
by 1123581321 17d ago
I'm drawing a different conclusion than you about that upgrade. Sorry! I definitely understand your advice; it's especially the best option when you are financially risk-adverse or pessimistic about technology but need to particip
8.
by 1123581321 17d ago
Walmart has had cheap insulin for decades, and update their formula periodically as patents expire. Not many know about it, though. I've used it when traveling and it works even though it's not as effective as the current prescrip
9.
by 1123581321 17d ago
I get the sensibility of that advice but isn't that the case no matter when you buy it? I mean, they announced a nice iPhone Pro, optimized over multiple generations, and then immediately made it look primitive with the Duo. :)
10.
by 1123581321 17d ago
That’s delusional, mate. Sorry.
11.
by 1123581321 18d ago
Yes, of course. Wikipedia has a quick summary of the most popular networks ranked by monthly active users. Facebook is #1 and Meta owns three of the top five. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_popular_social_pl
12.
by 1123581321 26d ago
Usually auto mode does mild things that are dismaying but not dangerous, or maybe not noticed (like if it posts sensitive local data in a request that gets logged but never exploited.)
13.
by 1123581321 27d ago
Sadly, true. I know a person who gets AI news from that YouTuber and quotes him like he’s a household name and pays him for some repackaged chat models. It’s tedious and hard to talk to them about basic/remedial aspects because their e
14.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
I see; thanks.
15.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
I’m not sure your point, sorry.
16.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
Apple buying Workflow (became Shortcuts). Its users have a better, faster tool and got it soon after acquisition. And it has many more users now.
17.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
To do that, you would have to never touch the money and invest aggressively. Most wouldn’t do that unless they didn’t need the money, i.e. already rich so not newfound wealth. You would also have to train your kids to responsibly use the mo
18.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
Market acceptance risk, geopolitical funding risk, reputational harm risk, for space flight and starlink specifically. The Musk risk section isn’t specific to AI.
19.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
I expect this will effectively be stated, that their success will depend on developing a succession of products and evolving the company in response to the market climate.
20.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
Thank you. Hopefully a good lesson for the GP to actually read prospectuses before making claims about them!
21.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
This is a non-story; for those who haven’t read them, prospectuses include every potential risk under the sun. There will be risks that never make the news alongside the exciting backlash.
22.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
Can’t be if they were having to scrub government meetings to put the puzzle together. Unless, of course, they made this before she was caught. :) Completely coincidentally, I’m typing this from the Aldi at 88 and 26, waiting out a storm.
23.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
Either they email me as a test, or the person who emailed me has let me know his real email. In one case, I texted the guy because documents were sensitive and contained his cell. I have a canned reply to these to try to get them fixed, so
24.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
As others said, this post is wrong. I’m another owner of first.last/firstlast since 2004. There was never a period where Google got the dots wrong. People will forget their middle initial in their email (or others won’t notice it), or
25.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
I don't find many to ask for too many permissions relative to what they do. There are many Slack apps people want, that necessarily need a lot of permissions, to the point where maybe people shouldn't want that app, but that'
26.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
You’d have the same issue as you’d need to be able to verify that your last vote was being counted, for displaying your vote back to you to have any value. A scheme to be able to show coercive parties fake votes would be known to them immed
27.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
I hadn't read it until now. Interesting find! I wonder why he chose that title as the teleology of I Cor 13:12 seems straightforward.
28.
by 1123581321 1mo ago
Through a glass darkly, if you will. :)
29.
by 1123581321 2mo ago
Current was just a vibe-coded thing that blew up about a month before people started to become inured to the Claude Code look. The essay was intriguing but the app wasn’t like it. The app is essentially a standard RSS clone reader with wate
30.
by 1123581321 2mo ago
Good retraction. The plagiarism part further down in the article shouldn't be missed. The developer has significant character issues.

More ›