111111IIIIIII

18 ms·

91.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
I didn't know this was possible, but in such a case why not set a 60Hz display to 48Hz, 59.95Hz, etc.?
92.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
> The same footage can be viewed on another monitor and the tearing issue is not present. This is what I was hoping someone would chime in about. I have never looked into whether it would be handled differently, but I would not trade a
93.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
Not enough to have a lower resolution display, and if a higher refresh rate will get rid of it then that is news to me. Will it?
94.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
> who in the world wants to use a 2:3 pulldown pattern on a progressive monitor? At least everyone tasked with editing 3:2 pulldown footage for 3:2 pulldown distribution, which is most of the video editors in North America the last tim
95.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
> The worst part of incorrect refresh rates for me is on panning footage and you get those janky blocky tears in the image. That sounds a lot more like rolling shutter artifacts than 3:2 pulldown. What kind of camera are you using? Are
96.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
> Why would you want to use 3:2 pulldown unless your display is interlaced At this point, the only great reason is that it's an industry standard, but that alone is more than enough reason to still do it, evidenced by the fact tha
97.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
Don't believe everything journalists tell you. ;) Kidding aside, I do seriously question whether that move would ever happen without it being forced.
98.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
> Do you plug a DisplayPort and an usb cable from windows and get kvm working? Yes. There is one upstream USB-C port on each display that is used for this purpose. > The monitors are daisy chained? Daisy chaining with Thunderbolt
99.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
Twitter will persist as long as Journalists stay on it, and everyone paying attention knows that, including Musk.
100.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
Theoretically maybe, but 3:2 pulldown is used for playing 23.976 fps video at 29.97Hz. Since this is HN maybe someone with more knowledge about how video editors and modern TVs typically handle this can jump in here. Regardless, I think thi
101.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
Also, the current Apple Studio Display and Apple XDR Pro Display are both 218 ppi.
102.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
My point is none of these refresh rates are multiples of 23.976.
103.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
Nor is 120. Even with a 240Hz display, capturing and editing should use 3:2 pulldown for best end user playback. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-two_pull_down
104.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
32" displays are a sweet spot in size for me as long as the pixel density is >200 ppi, but more for graphics applications than text editors. For 3D applications especially, it's very beneficial to have a lot of area on one scre
105.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
Group 4 does video/photo/graphics work so they prioritize color accuracy and high resolution, so they would always trade >60Hz for more resolution, at least up to a point that has yet to be achieved. And that isn't even fa
106.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
Why are you returning it? I am keeping mine because I don't know of anything better. Also, check out the MoErgo Glove80 keyboard.
107.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
The 3090 does support displayport 2.0, though. The 40 series are geared towards productivity use cases where people are fine with 60hz.
108.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
What a strange comment. The article gives a thesis followed by support for that thesis. I suspect we can blame the stock market for this decadence.
109.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
I just purchased 2 of the 6Ks and I am keeping both. AMA. I do not understand the complaints about pixel density. The display is 223 ppi, which is the same or slightly higher than Apple displays. I am using them in a dual display configurat
110.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
> I'd much rather have a barely good enough interface on a platform that works than a great UI on a platform that doesn't work. I don’t care what developers want. I care what the users want.
111.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
> as a solo SaaS builder it seems harder and harder these days to have any sort of job security This overlooks the hard work and risk undertook by the virtuous founders of Paypal and Stripe. *SBOs love to advocate the virtues of "
112.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
The issue is that this illustrates that Lemmy has any priorities above the onboarding process. My mind will need to be changed about that before I will read any further. Additionally, I can be quite confident that Lemmy has already alienate
113.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
As a subreddit admin considering moving to Lemmy, I stopped reading at: > If the Sign Up button spins indefinitely after clicking it, the username is already taken. There is currently an issue where the site does not inform you of this
114.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
That is the point. Having a job does not mean making a living or having any dignity.
115.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
Definition?
116.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
How insufferable and/or out of touch and/or smartass does one have to be to pretend this qualifies as popularly accessible information? I cannot even imagine...
117.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
Yes, but you aren't supposed to know that.
118.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
Additionally, you can say what you want about chattel slavery but it rendered a very strong employment rate.
119.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
Would you please explain the logic for the dishonesty as you explained the logic for diverging from meritocracy? Surely there is a good reason for such an allegedly respectable institution misleading the public that pays its bills, yes?
120.
by 111111IIIIIII 3y ago
I think this is reasonable. If nothing else, it is the aspect least possible to imitate. If included, the best imitation would be cheap strobing. Anything better than that would require synthesis, which is something that even rendering engi

More ›