11101010010001

4 ms·

1.
by 11101010010001 28d ago
AI is just confirming what was known by some but not by those who make decisions...you don't need thousands of coders to run a website.
2.
by 11101010010001 1mo ago
It was this way before AI.
3.
by 11101010010001 1mo ago
I thought pg was trying to live forever. Has he learned LLMs from scratch?
4.
by 11101010010001 1mo ago
the punched in the face expression is strange here. I get it but I also presume that you have never been punched in the face much like you never connected (that's the word you are looking for, also a boxing term) with art.
5.
by 11101010010001 2mo ago
Great parents are invisible.
6.
by 11101010010001 2mo ago
add time to the dimension and we'll find out what we already knew ... momentum kills.
7.
by 11101010010001 2mo ago
publications would likely lead to regulation, if the SEC was properly resourced.
8.
by 11101010010001 3mo ago
read Ron Maimon.
9.
by 11101010010001 3mo ago
Both your statement and the OPs are an appeal to expertise which is not a substitute for the scientific method.
10.
by 11101010010001 3mo ago
Very much this. Very funny to see we're back to hardware is still hard.
11.
by 11101010010001 4mo ago
All these analogies are just bad. If we are going to live with LLMs, let's reason from first principles. 'It feels like we're just going to be left with analogies'.
12.
by 11101010010001 4mo ago
The problem is we keep learning that learning doesn't scale and there is nothing we can do about.
13.
by 11101010010001 4mo ago
What is the current scientific proof for Game Boy Advance at age 6?
14.
by 11101010010001 4mo ago
There isn't a giant leap between the workers and the users. Stop using meta products period.
15.
by 11101010010001 4mo ago
Hold on. This is just geometry. Unless the number of top slots is growing, the cap will be fixed.
16.
by 11101010010001 4mo ago
>“All my clients already feel like they pay too much,” Pollack said. “These numbers are significant. I don’t care how wealthy you are.” If that argument holds up in court, we are all screwed.
17.
by 11101010010001 4mo ago
SEs would rather play many player versions of the prisoner's dilemma than unionize.
18.
by 11101010010001 4mo ago
just don't call it organized labor.
19.
by 11101010010001 4mo ago
That's a model.
20.
by 11101010010001 5mo ago
Your grandparents probably worked their asses off too.
21.
by 11101010010001 6mo ago
to be clear, marketers are not the only ones to blame for useless sites.
22.
by 11101010010001 6mo ago
The future is uncertain, always has been. Is the future more uncertain than in the past?
23.
by 11101010010001 7mo ago
take my pound of flesh.
24.
by 11101010010001 7mo ago
So reasoning from first principles is equivalent to doing it for the money?
25.
by 11101010010001 7mo ago
One could argue that a way of proving Fukuyama wrong would require a 'new ideology' leading to global nuclear disarmament.
26.
by 11101010010001 7mo ago
What is the 'INSERTNAME' law that explains how all conversations on HN, which is ostensibly focused on tech, devolve (evolve) into the realm of the humanities?
27.
by 11101010010001 8mo ago
Any solution that isn't based on first principles will make the problem worst. And even then, the first principles might show that you can't fix it. But at least you will know.
28.
by 11101010010001 8mo ago
You answered your own question. People are 'too scared' to share their thoughts so they share AIs instead. I suspect if you scared people about the use of AI, there may be an increase in usage.
29.
by 11101010010001 8mo ago
All it takes is a demographic trend to make the entire population a bunch of crackpots! Behold.
30.
by 11101010010001 8mo ago
Yes publishing is broken, but academics are the last people to jump onto platforms...they never left email. If you want to change the publishing game, turn publishing into email.

More ›