Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
0xblinq
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
391.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
For me that's Adonis.js. I've been using it for over a year and it's great. Although it's more the "Laravel of js" than the "Rails of js". P.S: Yes, I know Nest.js and I don't like it and don
392.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
Yeah, like one of the companies I briefly worked for. An outdated hell of WordPress, with no package.json, no linters, no formatters, copy & pasted / vendored dependencies, lot of NIH home built libraries, no tests, no framework ot
393.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
Agree. iron-session is great
394.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
> However one of the unexpected consequences How the hell... like... who decided to do Microservices in the first place if they didn't know this? This is such a rookie mistake. It's like somebody right out of high school just r
395.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
Being able to return JSON makes you "full stack" the same having wings makes a fly an airplane.
396.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
> The way I develop my own applications is very streamlined to serve a lot of people and generate revenue in a 1-2 step funnel Would love to hear the opinions of those that have to maintain applications made "your way" after yo
397.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
And you still don’t get it. Nevermind
398.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
I don’t have that problem, because I still use reactive frontend libraries in the frontend. Not using next.js doesn’t mean you’re in the stone ages doing query spaghetti. I just don’t use nextjs as a full stack or backend framework. Right t
399.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
Wait until in addition to authentication, you have to also add translations and validation messages and make all of this work together nicely, with ssr too. It’s a total nightmare. The only ones that would deny this is madness are those tha
400.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
I like it a lot and I do think it is the best backend option for node at the moment. I really think it has great potential. But i also think it is still not there. It’s missing a lot of things when you compare it to Laravel itself, the docu
401.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
Worst part for me is seeing sibling teams at my company fail miserably and live behind schedule and struggle a lot because they’re building full stack products/applications with it. And most of them don’t even realize how much they’re
402.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
Laravel + Turbo + Alpine + Tailwind
403.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
More battle tested, widely used, robust and overall just better frameworks and libraries for Web Dev and a bigger community, also specifically focused on web. That’s my bet.
404.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
Well, the thing is… for any non trivial web app, you do need a framework (spa or Unpoly like). The question here is if you use an existing one or end up writing your own. I don’t buy the “just use html, js and css”… giving the same develope
405.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
Well, the thing is… for any non trivial web app, you do need a framework (spa or Unpoly like). The question here is if you use an existing one or end up writing your own. I don’t buy the “just use html, js and css”… giving the same develope
406.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
Oh, sorry. I missed that.
407.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
C’mon, put a minimum effort to understand what it’s all about before making useless comments. It is not a framework to organize your own JavaScript (like react, vue, etc). It is a framework so that you don’t have to write JavaScript in the
408.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
And good luck with having a development environment or even decent end to end/integration testing once you start using all those services.
409.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
A friend of mine moved to a company where they use plain Laravel (with just some sprinkles of js using Alpine) and they deploy to heroku. A team of 10 devs, no systems/devops/Infra and he’s fascinated how well things go and how fa
410.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
I agree with everything you said up to the part about fresh and deno, where it looks like you’re falling in the same trap of those wanting to use react. You don’t even notice it but this is the problem. Always thinking the next shiny tool w
411.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
From my experience, this problem is also rooted on designers and product owners. My own team “modernized” a forum/blog tool used for internal documentation by moving a lot of it to react and SPA architecture and added ton of “app like”
412.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
> However, it's also true that the baseline expectation for web experiences is a lot higher in 2022 than it was in 2009 Is it?. I think this expected behavior and increased complexity comes more from designers and product owners tha
413.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
Livewire is intended to be used where you’d otherwise need to do an API call anyway. It is not intended to handle every single click and toggle and key press. You still do that on the front end, usually with Alpine. It is a way to avoid wri
414.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
In my opinion Unpoly does this in a very nice way, with what they call “compilers”.
415.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
Well, get ready for it. GitHub is moving towards React, Next, etc. I bet it will be another disaster like Reddit.
416.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
To me it looks like the opposite. It’s more batteries included, easier to use and has been around for longer. I like htmx too, but too me it’s only better on the marketing side.
417.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
I think this is only a concern from a code purist point of view. In real life business the productivity, security, ecosystem and guarantees of a battle proven tool matters *a lot*. Not sure what alternative you're proposing here and I
418.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
Another ex-Django user here. Can confirm.
419.
▲
AdonisJS: The Missing Node.js Framework
(jovandjukic.com)
4 points
by
0xblinq
4y ago
|
0 comments
420.
▲
by
0xblinq
4y ago
I really hope this does not end up like Reddit. Or that at least they keep an old.github.com that’s usable.
More ›