Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
0xF2
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
The Linux of Storage
(f2.svbtle.com)
2 points
by
0xF2
2y ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
State of the Cephalopod Returns at the Summit
(f2.svbtle.com)
2 points
by
0xF2
3y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
0xF2
4y ago
Red Hat Ceph Storage and ODF continue. The same team will continue to develop newer releases, now with dual IBM and RHT corporate access. Open Source commitment, upstream first, and foundation continue as before. I am a member of the team,
4.
▲
by
0xF2
6y ago
A brief discussion of the talk at Open Source Summit: How Many Ways Can You Fail? A Taxonomy of Corporate (in)Decision. (Podcast)
5.
▲
The Hedge #76 the Taxonomy of Indecision
(rule11.tech)
1 points
by
0xF2
6y ago
|
1 comments
6.
▲
by
0xF2
6y ago
Help improve Cephadm by submitting feedback upstream or to Red Hat!
7.
▲
Cephadm: A new way to install Ceph with Alpha 4
(ceph.io)
1 points
by
0xF2
6y ago
|
2 comments
8.
▲
Project: Making a Sound Card Oscilloscope
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
0xF2
6y ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
How Many Ways Can You Fail? A Taxonomy of Corporate (In)Decision
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
0xF2
6y ago
|
0 comments
10.
▲
by
0xF2
6y ago
Yay. Thank you.
11.
▲
Ceph Storage Roadmap 2021 at Red Hat Summit
(f2.svbtle.com)
5 points
by
0xF2
6y ago
|
2 comments
12.
▲
Ceph Block storage: putting noisy neighbors in their place with RBD top and QoS
(redhat.com)
5 points
by
0xF2
6y ago
|
0 comments
13.
▲
Red Hat Ceph 4: Easy-Peasy Installation
(ceph.io)
6 points
by
0xF2
7y ago
|
1 comments
14.
▲
by
0xF2
7y ago
Yes, two billion in a single bucket is a bit much, index sharding only goes to ~700M if I remember correctly.
15.
▲
by
0xF2
7y ago
We support multiple versions in parallel. Currently Jewel (which has just received the 5-year extension) and Luminous, with Nautilus set for release later this year. Beast is pretty cool. Full performance analysis coming in September!
16.
▲
Red Hat Releases Ceph 3.3
(f2.svbtle.com)
3 points
by
0xF2
7y ago
|
4 comments
17.
▲
Red Hat Ceph Storage 3.2: BlueStore Unleashed
(f2.svbtle.com)
1 points
by
0xF2
8y ago
|
0 comments
18.
▲
To the Bat Cluster! Setting Up Enterprise Linux for ARM on the X-Gene 1
(f2.svbtle.com)
6 points
by
0xF2
8y ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
How to Survive an OpenStack Cloud Meltdown with Ceph
(f2.svbtle.com)
2 points
by
0xF2
8y ago
|
0 comments
20.
▲
by
0xF2
9y ago
CephFS finally reached supported status -- and many other additions in this summary of Red Hat's new storage system.
21.
▲
Ceph 3.0: Block, Object and File Storage from One Cluster
(f2.svbtle.com)
5 points
by
0xF2
9y ago
|
1 comments
22.
▲
Choosing the right storage for your OpenStack Cloud
(f2.svbtle.com)
1 points
by
0xF2
9y ago
|
0 comments
23.
▲
by
0xF2
9y ago
The designer in the software team gets to decide what is available. Software that has no design has in itself been designed, but the choices were made by a developer instead. There is nothing inappropriate about one vendor making choices. t
24.
▲
by
0xF2
9y ago
I believe I have seen this work in Leopard through Lion, particularly Snow Leopard. I remember re-making the addressing of my home network once I changed jobs and the internal subnets were no longer different. More recently, I no longer pri
25.
▲
by
0xF2
9y ago
The sea of printers at the office. How do you simplify when "you see the whole network" as you put it?
26.
▲
by
0xF2
9y ago
I like it better than reading different signs in every office I visit. In the US the problem however is that recycling collection is not standardized. Each city does it differently, which gets in the way of the standardization you propose.
27.
▲
by
0xF2
9y ago
Why would one-bin be impossible? We have ways to differentiate commingled glass, plastic, and metal automatically (and mechanically). We can get fancier with AI if we need to. Always use the word impossible with the greatest care. Everythin
28.
▲
by
0xF2
9y ago
Care to offer us a design that solves the problem?
29.
▲
by
0xF2
9y ago
Fascinating. Thanks for sharing, I thin this is probably one extreme of the scale of effort taking care of garbage... and with good reason given the delicate ecosystem. The things you learn talking about design ;-)
30.
▲
by
0xF2
9y ago
That is actually a better point for recycling UX than saving a user's time, as most people do not throw away trash so many times a day to make UX matter. But the system does not work if it defeats the user's willingness to coopera
More ›