0xBA5ED

6 ms·

31.
by 0xBA5ED 6mo ago
Coming to a conclusion gracefully is better than continuing as a pawn for petty squabbles over control. There will be new things. The game dev/jam community transcends names and domains and will continue in many forms.
32.
by 0xBA5ED 6mo ago
Cognitive offloading via culture has many forms and many of them are not sustainable at all.
33.
by 0xBA5ED 6mo ago
People dislike AI music for different reasons. Some people think it's just unethical.
34.
by 0xBA5ED 6mo ago
I would seriously consider if you've developed an imaginary caricature in your mind that you apply to people you don't know. Further, I would consider if any living person actually lives up to it.
35.
by 0xBA5ED 3y ago
Your objective points were addressed. Any response to your subjective point "Everything about this screams X" would itself be subjective and not conducive to productive conversation.
36.
Big tech CEOs have private meeting with U.S. senators to discuss AI regulation(nbcnews.com)
3 points by 0xBA5ED 3y ago|0 comments
37.
by 0xBA5ED 3y ago
Not from me, since I didn't claim that all closed systems are cells.
38.
by 0xBA5ED 3y ago
Or... Life requires a closed system which requires a boundary. The boundary and its contents is considered a cell?
39.
by 0xBA5ED 3y ago
Yes, the anecdote is not a good example. "The bull is dead" is tragic but irrelevant. It would be like "Milestone 4 missed. Joel is gone". Who's Joel? Is he on vacation? Did he quit? Was he fired for causing the mis
40.
by 0xBA5ED 3y ago
A set of hieroglyphs for a formally designed and recognized language that is in use to communicate is one thing. Endless bits of arbitrary clip art is another.
41.
by 0xBA5ED 3y ago
The system exists. It's text.
42.
by 0xBA5ED 3y ago
I bet it's fatigue from the endless <new shiny thing> hype. It's easy to fall into a routine of dismissing everything that claims to be new and interesting.
43.
by 0xBA5ED 3y ago
Natural selection constrains the possible variation for each iteration so only a miniscule subset of possibilities is explored. That doesn't sound very brute-forcey to me.
44.
by 0xBA5ED 3y ago
If not for the heuristic of natural selection.
45.
by 0xBA5ED 3y ago
Well there is something rather satisfying about partitioning.
46.
by 0xBA5ED 3y ago
So what, by your estimation, are LLMs best for? Because they seem good for serving up relevant bits of information from vast amounts of information. Why do you think it's the worst thing they are good at?
47.
by 0xBA5ED 5y ago
That's a very ungenerous interpretation. But why take offense without knowing if the comment's recipient took offense?
48.
by 0xBA5ED 5y ago
Mine was "deauthenticate". Very surprising it isn't considered a legitimate word.
49.
by 0xBA5ED 5y ago
Let me guess: Nobody has access to the data because it is encrypted from literally everyone so there will never be any conflicts of interest ever, right?
50.
by 0xBA5ED 5y ago
The funny thing is, the reporter successfully embarrassed the state, then the state embarrassed itself further in response.
51.
by 0xBA5ED 5y ago
>coordinated unauthentic or disingenuous skepticism There is certainly some of this happening as with every issue, but echo chambers can easily emerge and sustain themselves without the need for coordinated bad actors. I believe the larg
52.
by 0xBA5ED 5y ago
Looks attached to that mesh and the mesh was attached by some kind of adhesive. You can see the fur it took with it.
53.
by 0xBA5ED 5y ago
As a frequent user of the PC client, I think it's a bloated mess which gets slower by the day (with poor UX to boot). And they're talking about expanding their market? It's clear what their priorities are.
54.
by 0xBA5ED 5y ago
A tip if you have an annoying fly in your house that's hard to swat. Turn off all the lights except the bathroom. In a few minutes it'll fly in. Close the door and it's mano-a-mano.
55.
by 0xBA5ED 5y ago
First: I did not say that subjective means arbitrary. Second: The problem with this is, there still must some agreement on what constitutes an acceptable answer when you "ask them". This brings us back to the subjectivity of psych
56.
by 0xBA5ED 5y ago
>just like it's possible to have a reasonable level of physical safety while driving a car Then again, it's reasonably straightforward to measure physical injury and come to some agreement about acceptable risk. Psychological
57.
by 0xBA5ED 6y ago
Would you need an argument to support it if it wasn't opinion?
58.
by 0xBA5ED 6y ago
Apparently not, since you are wrong. You are paranoid "my dude".
59.
by 0xBA5ED 6y ago
>(Check the username, check his commentary history, he's just Another One Of Those.) Wow. You are so off the mark I don't even know what to say. It's this kind of thinking that divides the world. It is paranoid us vs them
60.
by 0xBA5ED 6y ago
>That's the same thing I disagree. You can enforce behavioral restrictions without reducing it to us vs them. It is about order and maintaining good relations. In the case of people disrupting your conference, you can have them remo

More ›