0x83F1

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by 0x83F1 12y ago

   If your pet eats something it shouldn't the absolute last thing you want is "manual intervention". Have you ever seen how potters cut lumps of doughy clay? They do it with wire. If you pull you can do the same to your pets in
2. 2.▲
   by 0x83F1 12y ago

   You can get a 5" 640x480 E-Ink panel for about $15-20 shipped from china.
3. 3.▲
   by 0x83F1 12y ago

   No. In a Bitcoin transaction the fees are implies by in minus out. There's no way of knowing without a proof the value of a particular output, so if you accidentally spend one far below it's actual value you can end up paying an i
4. 4.▲
   by 0x83F1 12y ago

   See, that's the misconception most people have. What if an API tells you that you have an unspent output worth 0.01 BTC. and you spend it based on this information. If the API lied you could have just spent a 500 BTC output straight to
5. 5.▲
   by 0x83F1 12y ago

   It's the resin of the CPU's top surface, just incredibly worn down from being on somebodies keychain for years.
6. 6.▲
   by 0x83F1 12y ago

   That is incredibly dangerous behavior. You must be validating your own information before you sign any transactions, preferably with a full node or at a bare minimum SPV proofs. If you believe what information a random API gives you (incorr