0x2AF31DA8

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by 0x2AF31DA8 8y ago

   I believe the content of the linked video is what's being referred to as "openly hostile", with discussion of participation in competitive sporting events being reasonable.
2. 2.▲
   by 0x2AF31DA8 8y ago

   First, I admit I haven't watched the video you linked. I do want to engage with you in good faith, but videos are generally just too much of a time sink for me - especially when it's from an organization I don't particularly
3. 3.▲
   by 0x2AF31DA8 8y ago

   https://qntm.org/asteroids > I believe that there is a threshold of power beyond which nobody can be trusted. Where, in fact, it is impossible for any entity to even theoretically demonstrate the track record of judgemen
4. 4.▲
   by 0x2AF31DA8 8y ago

   I do agree that a committee likely won't be able to make meaningful progress if their views differ on too low a level. I also suspect we would both agree that an ethics committee whose members don't hold views on human dignity tha
5. 5.▲
   by 0x2AF31DA8 8y ago

   If the outcry in the media were that she had no place on such a committee due to representing an organization which forwards unsound and poorly reasoned arguments, misrepresents the scientific consensus, or similar, then it would be a compl
6. 6.▲
   by 0x2AF31DA8 8y ago

   > This critically misstates the claim. Apologies, I didn't mean to imply that you personally stated exactly that (it was the GP that did). However the context (both this comment chain and the entire thread) is critically importa
7. 7.▲
   by 0x2AF31DA8 8y ago

   > all sensible moral systems tell us to treat LGBT individuals with basic dignity 100% agreed. But in context, GP said: > holds abhorrent positions on issues like climate change and LGBTQ rights and comments of a similar sentiment app