0x1DEADCA0

5 ms·

1.
by 0x1DEADCA0 2y ago
No, they're making a choice between the long-term negative effects of not losing weight naturally, vs the possibility of long-term negative effects of using artificial methods. This isn't polemic, as even things as basic as birth
2.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
It is a waste of time and a growing place of toxicity a smugness, but it is not very different from the rest of the internet.
3.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
Anything that's needed to be given up, how do we estimate it?
4.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
The good news is, if you are right about nuclear being safe, then I will benefit from it. If you are wrong, I will be too busy being dead to remember that I was right!
5.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
"therefore we need everyone to eat more big macs"
6.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
In what world can you convince me that nuclear is safe when we have Chernobyl and Fukushima? Like are we going to compared it to coal or something of the sort? When nuclear fails, which it will, through accident or terrorism, it fails forev
7.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
Why should the power needs of certain people be put above the safety of giant land areas? I am happy to pay a premium for technologies that are less efficient but safer. When did it become acceptable to say that society needs to pursue as m
8.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
"Lessons from McDonalds-- chemicals and fats must be well regulated, not ditched"
9.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
Or in the case of a natural disaster, not going anywhere on account of not being able to charge it ;)
10.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
Because, much like their laptops and phones, the people who are buying them aren't "optimizing for reliability", but rather "showing off" which turns out to be a pretty profitable venture from Apple's point of
11.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
There is honestly not very much revolutionary about Bitcoin as a system in the real world, because it is so burdensome to use[1] that you cannot easily use it for facilitating financial transactions without trusting a middleman[2]. The resu
12.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
something the government need not do is this
13.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
So all of the software engineers out there being paid for their labor by companies flush with cash are... not, being paid? in your mind?
14.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
Once the evil rich pigs have lots of bread, more than even they can eat, do they then not start using it to purchase labor from the starving poor?
15.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
For me it's about 4 hours
16.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
the pleasure was all mine!
17.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
To prevent the market from thinking that a company worth $0 is worth $4 billion
18.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
Mockito
19.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
I say we ban it just so we can all see that it doesn't work, and then the politicians will continue to ignore that. Sorry Rockstar!
20.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
Where were you for the four years of "trade war" and Pompeo calling out China about Xinjiang?
21.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
This was considered a GOP talking point not 3 months ago
22.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
I would first ask the question of why machine learning, just like I would for why video games, or why react. If you are trying to learn it solely because it is popular and you just want a job, then you have a few problems: competing with ot
23.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
Sickle cell disease also has a disparate impact, who should we tax and regulate to right this wrong?
24.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
4 cookies for $13, delivered fresh and warm and on demand. What's the profit margin on the cookies after taxes, regulatory compliance, labor, technology, equipment, marketing, interest, loan payments, and insurance? Negative 20%?
25.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
He was going to receive it and now they're clawing it back
26.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
It is possible for a programmer and a janitor to both not like their jobs and voice their opinions online about why.
27.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
Regardless of its turing completeness, it has a syntax and is wildly used, popular, and useful
28.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
God bless Java, Javascript, C, HTML, and CSS.
29.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
Why spend a few hundred bucks on amazon when you could just wait a few days for your laptop to do the same ^.^
30.
by 0x1DEADCA0 6y ago
raspi has already come close enough with the raspi zero, the bottleneck is not hardware price/availability but rather people's ability to write efficient programs and solve human problems

More ›