0verD0ses

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by 0verD0ses 10y ago

   Turns out both sides were right, but also wrong, so they basically cancel each other out.
2. 2.▲
   by 0verD0ses 10y ago

   Although there is a lot of local variation, after all America is the third most highly populated country in the world, I would broadly agree with this picture.
3. 3.▲
   by 0verD0ses 10y ago

   It's not quite as simple as that. Immigration can in some cases actually create more jobs in the economy, but in other cases doesn't have this effect, so its hard to pinpoint the optimal amount of immigration for economic growth.
4. 4.▲
   by 0verD0ses 10y ago

   This is true, but voters are not good at dealing with ambiguity, unlike (some) economists. If politicians muddy their message by focusing too much on the small disadvantages of immigration compared to its large advantages, it will make them
5. 5.▲
   by 0verD0ses 10y ago

   Yes that is true, but why go backwards?
6. 6.▲
   by 0verD0ses 10y ago

   Hopefully they can cut down on excessive packaging at the same time: packagingnews.co.uk/news/environment/amazon-customers-criticise-excessive-packaging-21-12-2015
7. 7.▲
   by 0verD0ses 10y ago

   I doubt this will offset the huge boost in emissions which will come with Amazon's 'Flex' service, which will see products delivered fast via horribly inefficient passenger cars, as opposed to relatively efficient vans and tr