0points

17 ms·

331.
by 0points 2y ago
This is why we dont encode mp3 in 96kbps or whatever.
332.
by 0points 2y ago
Yea, same. But with the Commodore 64 BASIC.
333.
by 0points 2y ago
IIRC, I got GWBASIC from the official MSDOS 3.3 install discs. One had to write code using the EDLIN editor. I live in Sweden. PEEK and POKE:d my way to my very own computer.
334.
by 0points 2y ago
A JRE + binary deployment weights in over 100 MB. An ordinary compiled binary would be a fraction of that size, saving you time in provisioning and deployment.
335.
by 0points 2y ago
I love to hear these kind of success stories! Glad you found proper tooling to stay productive with.
336.
by 0points 2y ago
You seem to assume that only you is interested in aliens. Let me remind you that many of us grew up with The X Files. Of course we paid attention. We just seem to be less gullible.
337.
by 0points 2y ago
------> Point ---> You
338.
by 0points 2y ago
While your questions is interesting, it is not related to the news being discussed, which is about if USA is covering up details about aliens. I feel most intelligent people understand there's life elsewhere in the universe. Also, peop
339.
by 0points 2y ago
As a Swede, I have pondered over something similar. Nobody I have ever met have been in USA. It's obviously a satire made up by illuminati to enrage the masses while they dismantle the welfare system /s
340.
by 0points 2y ago
Why'd anyone take Jones words as truth anymore? He's a convicted serial lier. The domain obviously has changed owners.
341.
by 0points 2y ago
> This is why the ML crowd sticks with Python (numpy) thats incredibly fast. That is not why. You stick to python because it's your common denominator. You all picked it up in school. Python the most popular language around, and one
342.
by 0points 2y ago
IIRC, that's how symphony and other php frameworks do dependency injection.
343.
by 0points 2y ago
It's spelled crêpe
344.
by 0points 2y ago
Instant red flag. Like "Scrum master" used to be back in the day.
345.
by 0points 2y ago
Would love to hear your feedback either way
346.
by 0points 2y ago
What's nice in here exactly, and please use your own words instead of referring to ChatGPT transcripts. From the transcript you link that I read, I can see that it replied some generic mumbo: > Advanced models sometimes produce outp
347.
by 0points 2y ago
Yes. Not immediately, but eventually like parent said. Is there something lost in (your) translation, or are your single word post just extraordinarily hard to comprehend? If you had a question, please use more words. Seems like you are jus
348.
by 0points 2y ago
"duties" continues it's downward spiral into oblivion
349.
by 0points 2y ago
> The idea that iPhones magically communicate with each other to “reboot randomly” when off a cellular network (assumably would happen on a plane easily) is pretty far fetched. iOS devices communicate thru a separate ultra-wideband mesh
350.
by 0points 2y ago
Old news by now, but yea. https://www.theverge.com/2024/11/3/24286842/nintendo-alarmo-...
351.
by 0points 2y ago
GeForce Experience is optional.
352.
by 0points 2y ago
The one in a restricted container.
353.
by 0points 2y ago
And how did you measure the time it took author to come up with this colorscheme? You seem to downplay the values of skills you do not possess.
354.
by 0points 2y ago
> my point before this thread got derailed was that we're holding (coding) AI to a higher standard than actual humans, namely to expect to write bug-free code This seems like a very layman attitude and I would be surprised to find m
355.
by 0points 2y ago
No, that would require AGI. Actual reasoning. Adversaries are already detecting issues tho, using proven means such as code review and fuzzing. Google project zero consists of a team of rock star hackers. I don't see LLM even replacing
356.
by 0points 2y ago
Yea, I'm thinking along the same lines. The companies valuing the expensive talent currently working on Google will be the winner. Google and others are betting big right now, but I feel the winner might be those who watches how it unf
357.
by 0points 2y ago
Yes. The models require training data and they already been fed the internet. More and more of the content generated since is LLM generated and useless as training data. The models get worse, not better by being fed their own output, and ri
358.
by 0points 2y ago
> LLMs can easily find errors in outputs they themselves just produced. Really? That must be a very recent development, because so far this has been a reason for not using them at scale. And noone is. Do you have a source?
359.
by 0points 2y ago
> LLM based systems will be writing more and more code at all companies. At Google, today, for sure. I do believe we still are not across the road on this one. > if this can be accompanied by an increase in software quality, which is
360.
by 0points 2y ago
No, not at all. "classic" intellisense is reliable, so why introduce random source in the process?

More ›