4 ms·
What's nice in here exactly, and please use your own words instead of referring to ChatGPT transcripts. From the transcript you link that I read, I can see tha
by 0points 2y ago
What's nice in here exactly, and please use your own words instead of referring to ChatGPT transcripts.
From the transcript you link that I read, I can see that it replied some generic mumbo:
> Advanced models sometimes produce outputs with identifiable patterns or "fingerprints." If the outputs carry such signatures, experts might trace them back to AlphaFold 3.
Suggesting ChatGPT have no understanding of what AlphaFold is.
Then continues to dream up nonsense scenarios such as
> If AlphaFold 3 requires online access or activation, usage logs could potentially reveal unauthorized activities.
Showing us that it has no understanding of the legalese it was asked to analyze.
How do you think this adds to the discussion?