0c3ca83

3 ms·

1.
by 0c3ca83 6d ago
If you're advocating that we die out -- you first, please.
2.
by 0c3ca83 7d ago
I'm just waiting for "Humanity was never the point, let our AI children transcend and replace us". Maybe it's time to reject utopia.
3.
by 0c3ca83 7d ago
gestures outside
4.
by 0c3ca83 7d ago
Seems stupid.
5.
by 0c3ca83 7d ago
> the author can ask the same question - why should I write something if you're just going to use a LLM to summarize it ? I wouldn't. LLMs don't summarize things very well. If you don't care if someone wrote it, and
6.
by 0c3ca83 7d ago
Sorry, we're not working to make people better, we're busy trying to build a god to stand over us.
7.
by 0c3ca83 8d ago
You are a god. You step on the puny human and create a thousand sunsets. Maybe the photographer wasn't needed in the first place.
8.
by 0c3ca83 8d ago
> Let's say that happens. What reason is there for the company to employ the meat proxy? The company can just run the LLM in a loop and lay off the employee. Why do you think management is so gung-ho about LLMs? Employees are expe
9.
by 0c3ca83 9d ago
Beats the hell out of most of the LLM-generated "honest assesments" of things on this site.
10.
by 0c3ca83 10d ago
Taste is just a set of statistically expressible heuristics for what other people will think is good. I don't undestand why you think this is impossible for AI to do. It feels like today, taste in design is similar to where software en
11.
by 0c3ca83 10d ago
Why do you think judgement is impossible to automate? What aspects of it do you think make it hard?
12.
by 0c3ca83 10d ago
This is a test balloon; the eventual end state is going to be buying bias for model recommendations. With agentic commerce, you end up with this: > > Hey, ChatGPT, I need a new pair of shoes! > Of course, Nike has a great pair t
13.
by 0c3ca83 10d ago
Why do you belive that agents wouldn't be able to take over product management, and generate prompts for the "software engineer" agents?
14.
by 0c3ca83 12d ago
Yes, you asked it for a good, hard challenge for an IT security student. I'd suggest checking if it succeeded by asking an IT security student, and not an LLM. Students are still learning, and have not been trained on vulerabilities. Q
15.
by 0c3ca83 12d ago
Yes, alignment is the architectural solution. But it's also fantasy; you can't align with everyone. And even worse, even if it were possible, the people doing the alignment are only going to align up to where it keeps them profita
16.
by 0c3ca83 12d ago
Yes, so, in other words it's patching the internals. And the "how it works" is vibeslop.
17.
by 0c3ca83 17d ago
"Don't worry, it'll make us rich -- and that's nearly the same as everything being just fine"
18.
by 0c3ca83 17d ago
> The current government is maximally evil Wow. That's incredibly optimistic. Imagine, for example, the next 'no kings' protest is met with machine gun fire, rather than ice sporadically killing activists. And then start
19.
by 0c3ca83 17d ago
Future is bright because it's going up in flames.
20.
by 0c3ca83 18d ago
> Not to mention you just can't trust a model's judgement if the highest bidder chooses what it thinks But you already can't trust a model's judgement, and there's an entire industry around "GEO" or &
21.
by 0c3ca83 18d ago
It's weird seeing someone promote home gardening by selling grocery store products.
22.
by 0c3ca83 20d ago
But this is a company building on AI.
23.
by 0c3ca83 20d ago
It's weird seeing someone trying to promote self-hosting, while building everything with Claude.
24.
by 0c3ca83 20d ago
So why would you mmap?
25.
by 0c3ca83 24d ago
...I'm still confused why you wouldn't use memcpy?
26.
by 0c3ca83 25d ago
Why would you use uring to read from an mmap? Couldn't you just memcpy?
27.
by 0c3ca83 1mo ago
Yes, the same compiler generates the same output given the same input. I'd be willing to put a large amount of money on that result. I read a lot of assembly.
28.
by 0c3ca83 1mo ago
How is this different from what's built into Claude?