0binbrain

4 ms·

1.
by 0binbrain 6y ago
TL;DR but from the summary it says "Socially acquired" which seems like a leap to me. Couldn't it also be as simple as children don't fully understand all the difference between themelves and animals. For example, my 3 y
2.
by 0binbrain 6y ago
Finally getting it.
3.
by 0binbrain 7y ago
All this discussion is spot on. The problem is all these startups now think they are FAANG companies also. You're not Google dude and you're probabaly passing on great hires and making the hiring process harder on everyone. We rec
4.
by 0binbrain 7y ago
From my perspective, the tech hiring process is still mostly broken and cold hearted. I don't think hiring companies are specifically discriminating against older developers though. I think its just difficult to leave the candidate fee
5.
by 0binbrain 8y ago
Vim worked out of the box for me on my macbook. I guess someone fixed it?
6.
by 0binbrain 10y ago
Yeah, makes sense. It seems like when a network stops providing useful adversarial feedback that in and of itself is a learning experience for the smarter network. While it didn't reach an equilibrium it now knows it's at least sm
7.
by 0binbrain 10y ago
I believe an equilibrium would be achieved at a single point of state/time for any of those games you mentioned. The equilibrium being the best next move given what you know about your risk and your opponent.
8.
by 0binbrain 10y ago
I believe that the key point here is that as adversarial networks compete against each other repeatedly they eventually will converge on a Nash Equilibrium. Nash Equilibrium from Wikipedia: "Amy is making the best decision she can, tak