00F_

10 ms·

31.
by 00F_ 4y ago
hey, im very concerned about AI and AGI and it is so refreshing to read your comments. over the years i have worried about and warned people about AI but there are astonishingly few people to be found that actually think something should be
32.
by 00F_ 4y ago
every other day i am reminded about the state of AI and i feel complete despair. why do people not realize exactly what you just said, that this endeavor is ultimately about replacing humanity? what other long-term result could the concept
33.
by 00F_ 4y ago
emergent deductive ability. lol. what do you call its writing, emergent writing ability? this is an algorithm where all the numbers are random, literally everything about it is emergent except the structure of the nodes. people have this st
34.
by 00F_ 4y ago
a big problem with these AI developments is that they change things so much and so fundamentally that it makes us all like boomers trying to use the internet in 1990. no idea whats going on. stumbling and fumbling along. you say that it wil
35.
by 00F_ 4y ago
glib
36.
by 00F_ 4y ago
right but AI was nowhere near passing the turing test in 2017. or doing anything else that it does right now. do you have any proof behind what youre saying? not even hard proof but some kind of axiom or even just some chain of logic. dont
37.
by 00F_ 4y ago
we have mass production. if you could mass produce fine woodwork then people wouldnt do it professionaly. if you could mass produce clothing then there would be no sweatshops. cloth is really hard to manipulate apparently. i mean, the only
38.
by 00F_ 4y ago
statistically, you did. or if not, you thought it. i spent many years watching this space and i very, very rarely saw someone who was correct about the next several years in 2017. even in 2018, when it was obvious that something might be up
39.
by 00F_ 4y ago
your position is illogical. we cant predict the future, therefore we shouldnt try to preempt anything. oh sorry, "worry" about anything. we should stop worrying about global warming according to you. we cant predict if global warm
40.
by 00F_ 4y ago
in 2017, how confidently would you have predicted that machines would not stand any chance of doing what chatGTP or stable diffusion do now?
41.
Ask HN: What has AI ruined for you?
6 points by 00F_ 4y ago|14 comments
42.
by 00F_ 4y ago
ive sent you an email. looking forward to talking to you.
43.
by 00F_ 4y ago
this is a great comment. one of the key concepts of an AI future is the information implosion. there is a vast amount of data all around us, in our sensors and on the internet, and humans extract very little utility from this data in compar
44.
by 00F_ 4y ago
you can predict the behavior of complex systems axiomatically. my predictions are very general because they are axiomatic. the most important axiom in play is that natural selection will guide the development and behaviour of the creatures
45.
by 00F_ 4y ago
if anyone else is worried about AGI and the singularity, and wants to help prevent these things, i think we should get in touch. as far as i know, there is no serious political group that is advocating for regulation of AI based on human re
46.
by 00F_ 4y ago
the idea that this man is a billionaire is mind-blowing. this article is absolutely vapid. picking it apart is more for sport than anything else. We had two such anti-technology jobs moral panics in the last 20 years — “outsourcing” enabled
47.
by 00F_ 4y ago
i have no idea why people go straight to china every time regulating AI is brought up. its something to do with a rudimentary understanding of geopolitics i think. china. the answer to your question is the same answer to the same question r
48.
by 00F_ 4y ago
i didnt brandish because brandishing it showing a deadly weapon with the intent to intimidate. if a person draws their weapon in self defence they arent brandishing even if they dont end up firing. i didnt draw my pistol to stop a theft i d
49.
by 00F_ 4y ago
lets say there was a global coalition of countries that considered the creation or advancement of AGI a material threat to the safety of all humans. this would qualify countries that do advanced AI research for retaliation from NATO or othe
50.
by 00F_ 4y ago
from your comment i am pretty confident that you are around 19 years old. it doesnt seem like you actually read my comment. i guess i will respond to you but there is no comment in the world that could set you straight. you need more experi
51.
by 00F_ 4y ago
here we see, basically, a potential feedback loop. AI tools advance brain science -- more advanced brain science can then inform progress in AI. this is why the situation is dangerous: because people dont think about these feedback loops. p
52.
by 00F_ 4y ago
i used to live on the coast and moved to a midwest state. i did it because property is cheaper in the midwest and also i thought it would be refreshing to get a break from coastal culture. i moved to the midwest but a metro area in the midw
53.
by 00F_ 4y ago
can someone flag this post for its stupid title? the object is not mysterious, they say what it probably is right at the start of the article. i see the mods change titles like this all the time. i dont think this should be an exception. th
54.
by 00F_ 4y ago
at the time that carter was running for office, south korea was embroiled in a political battle between student-church led populists and park chung hee, essentially a benevolent dictator. the populists or leftists as we might call them now
55.
by 00F_ 4y ago
mention to people in real life and online that you are worried about AI. it doesnt cost anything and it makes a real difference.
56.
by 00F_ 4y ago
the world has changed dramatically in only one year. these advancements in AI are talked about everywhere and by everyone. in 2018 i warned people i knew and i wrote many comments online warning people that huge changes were coming. almost
57.
by 00F_ 4y ago
its true that the name is not accurate. but in reality the name hasnt caused anyone to buy the product because they believed they could take a nap behind the wheel and tesla doesnt deceptively market the product as such. the name is inspira
58.
by 00F_ 4y ago
what videos are you talking about? when i watch recent FSD videos (there have been regressions recently) on youtube the car generally drives itself. if you showed those videos to someone in the 90s they would without hesitation remark &quot
59.
by 00F_ 4y ago
dude ive been looking at your youtube channel and i am blown away. you do such a fantastic job dude. and you are representing the midwest very well indeed. i was fascinated by your video about earthquakes. well done dude.
60.
by 00F_ 4y ago
wow, this blows me away completely. ive never seen a game that seemed like the intention behind it was to be the spiritual successor to riven. and looking around the web there seems to be a healthy base of people who are excited about this

More ›