3 ms·
... and people should also be aware those patents might be invalidated by re-examination or an action in federal court. I don't know why you aren't allowed to d
by nkw 11y ago
... and people should also be aware those patents might be invalidated by re-examination or an action in federal court. I don't know why you aren't allowed to disclose who now 'owns' the patent you refer to. It is trivial to locate this information with the link you provide and some googling.
Also your statement "the collective IP is already owned by a major media conglomerate" if taken to refer to totality of technology which makes it "possible to replace people, objects, environments, & audio elements automatically through a series of techniques" is false.
- bsenftner 11y agoI beg to differ, there most definitely is a series of patented technologies that in total enable replacement of people, objects, environments and audio elements in traditional media. That key is traditional, linear media. New forms of media, interactive forms, VR/AR and hybrids are wide open fields. That's a big reason new fields of technology are so exiting - it's not just interesting to us geeks, but valuable to the businesspeople.
- yarrel 11y agoOnly until it's locked down and killed for 20 years.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]