4 ms·
I think the use of real names was identified as one of the reasons for Facebook's success[1], so they just copied that. [1] http://techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/my
by gherkin0 11y ago
I think the use of real names was identified as one of the reasons for Facebook's success[1], so they just copied that.
[1] http://techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/myspace-quietly-begins-encouraging-users-to-use-their-real-names/ http://techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/myspace-quietly-begins-enco...
- wmeredith 11y agoCargo culting at its finest. Google is really smart about a lot of different things, but they know fuck-all about social. They were just going through the motions.
- reagency 11y agoReal Names policy was the brainchild of a 40-yr-old multi-millionare who was an expert in cultivating his personal brand and image, and knows not donsay anythig embarrassing online. Why would you care to use Google+ in any other way, he thought.
- protomyth 11y agoFacebook's lesson to Google should have been one of caution for forcing real names since Facebook is pathetic at telling if a name is real or not. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/feb/16/facebook-real-name-policy-suspends-native-americans http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/feb/16/facebook-r... Once again, if your verification of real names excludes a whole group's conventions, you have failed hard.
- IshKebab 11y agoYeah they forgot that people only used real names on Facebook because it was extremely private (only people in your university could see you). Google+ on the other hand is full of public actions - Youtube comments, app reviews, etc.