3 ms·
No, the opinion is not even logically valid because there is nothing that shows Google's punishment of his server is required to reduce spam. It's like elimina
by hueving 11y ago
No, the opinion is not even logically valid because there is nothing that shows Google's punishment of his server is required to reduce spam.
It's like eliminating poverty by killing all poor people. Yes, it would work, but the side effects are worse than the outcome.
- pekk 11y agoLogical validity only means that the argument works given its premises, not that the premises are correct.
- pbhjpbhj 11y agoSoundness and validity are often confused in common parlance, if you attempt to interpret his comment in the best light then it seems well reasoned. Your 'majority rule' analysis is flawed as the ability for individuals to access the internet without relying on [specific] mega corps or other major organisations serves the needs of the majority. The ultimate end of requiring people to satisfy a corporations demands before being allowed to communicate using the common means (email here) is anti-democratic, it gives too much power to those companies.