4 ms·
"The government" ? There are over 40 developed countries whose governments fund scientific research. Several of them have heads of state who would love to fin
by ocschwar 11y ago
"The government" ?
There are over 40 developed countries whose governments fund scientific research.
Several of them have heads of state who would love to find evidence against AGW: Canada and Australia come to mind. Angela Merkel would love to find evidence that the coal mining way of life in East Germany isn't a problem. (But she knows not to fight against scientific evidence.)
Our own government had a republican president not so long ago.
Again, if there was any avenue of scientific research that could find evidence against AGW, there would be money to fund it, be it from governments or corporations. Deniers have spent over 100M on propaganda in recent years. That's a lot of money that could have gone towards research if there was any to be done.
There was exactly one attempt to do that, with the grant given to Richard Muller at Berkeley. That blew up in the denier's faces, and they're never doing that again.
[update]
"When you resort to calling people who disagree with your hypothesis "deniers" then..."
I am calling them deniers because they have ample funds with which to find evidence for their case, and they are refraining from doing so.
[update]
"Thanks for conceding that there are 40 governments putting money"
I did not say "40 governments putting money into the other side." I said "40 governments funding science." And as I pointed out, the governments of Australia and Canada would love to find evidence against AGW. And yet government funded scientists in both countries continue to find evidence for it. Our own government under George W. Bush would have loved to find evidence against AGW. And yet our scientists in NASA, NOAA, and academia, were finding evidence for it the entire time.
- MCRed 11y agoWhen you resort to calling people who disagree with your hypothesis "deniers" then you've given up any pretense of believing in science, and as far as I'm concerned, you have admitted your movement is purely political. ( Which is good because the science doesn't support you.) Thanks for conceding that there are 40 governments putting money into the other side-- which dismisses your absurd claims that industry as more money.
- Daishiman 11y agoNo dude, you're a denier. Please, stop insisting that your position has any validity, scientifically or politically. It has no scientific credibility whatsoever. And the economic motivation is obvious in plain sight.