3 ms·
It implies to me that nothing's infiltrated science except scientists. It shows to me that the fossil fuel lobby knows AGW is real, knows that if they hire any
by ocschwar 11y ago
It implies to me that nothing's infiltrated science except scientists.
It shows to me that the fossil fuel lobby knows AGW is real, knows that if they hire any scientists to look at the issue, those scientists will once again confirm that AGW is real, and so they prefer to fund denialism.
That's the thing: you can have debates and disagreements, but physical reality does take sides.
[update]
You're a citizen. You can read the scientific papers on AGW regardless of whether they're used by the IPCC for their own papers.
Might I suggest you do that?
- MCRed 11y agoWhat about the reports from the UN IPCC That misrepresented the claims of scientists named in the reports? (To the Scientists protests.) In fact, IPCC reports-- which are not science but political propaganda-- are the sum total of "science" that AGW proponents rely on when making their political claims (And their claim that "Science" agrees with them, which they think justifies calling anyone who disagrees with the hypothesis by the epithet of "denier")
- Daishiman 11y agoWhat reports? The scientists publishing the data are very much involved in the IPCC.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]