8 ms·
Highcharts: JavaScript Charts that don't suck
- nym 17y agoI'm a big fan of charts, and I'm glad to see someone made a good non-flash interactive chart solution.
- piranha 17y agoLook at protovis also.
- netghost 17y agoThere are tons of good non flash ones. Someone mentioned Protovis, which is neat, but last I check it wasn't supported in IE. There is also Flot (jquery) and Flotr (prototype), and a handful of others. I use a modified version of Flotr, and it works great.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- paddy_m 17y ago2 years ago I built chartwidget . http://demo.chartidget.com http://demo.chartidget.com I haven't quite kept up with javascript charting recently. I was aiming to build a google finance/yahoo finance competitor. The thing that always surprised me about google finance/yahoo finance charts was that they didn't take advantage of data already in the browser. When their flash charts would try to plot a moving average, they would make another request back to the server for more data, Why? The browser already has enough data to derive the moving average.
- harry 17y agoI used jQplot on a whim project a while ago and greatly enjoyed using it as well.
- grayrest 17y agoI strongly recommend Protovis: http://vis.stanford.edu/protovis/ex/ http://vis.stanford.edu/protovis/ex/ If graphael gets into shape it might be decent as well.
- gruseom 17y agoA cursory look suggests that Protovis doesn't work in IE. Is that correct?
- cubtastic71 17y agoIts IE8 that has the issues it seems - switch to compatiblity mode and it eventually renders.
- oconnor0 17y agoI'm just getting "[object Error]" in IE7 with nothing beyond that - no rendering.
- kylemathews 17y agoAnyone have experience with Flot?
- zackattack 17y agoYeah, I use it for plotting follower data for CustomerFind. The chart on the homepage (http://www.customerfind.com http://www.customerfind.com) is a screenshot of part of a user's controlpanel, and was rendered using flot. It was very easy to get flot set up, it plays nicely with the rest of my js, including jQuery. Flot is fast. P.S. CustomerFind v2 is no longer focusing on AutoFollow, though the copy on the homepage reflects otherwise [http://customerfind.posterous.com/do-you-sell-a-product-or-service-online-start http://customerfind.posterous.com/do-you-sell-a-product-or-s...]
- Maciek416 17y agoYes, we use Flot to visualize some pretty beefy data with many data points. Flot has some very nice features and is a reasonably active project. The big problem I see with a project like Highcharts (and other Flot alternatives I've tried) is that features like animation and pretty aesthetics are center stage while performance is typically hugely lacking. We've driven Flot to its limit, and by far I can say that the winner of JS charting APIs is going to be the library that can perform well not just on Chrome but on Internet Explorer too. We've charted things here that take under 1 second to render in Firefox/Chrome/Safari while taking 10-15 minutes with the CPU pegged (yes, you read that correctly) in IE. We've gotten around it with a bit of work, but it's still a glaring problem for the APIs, and a glaring problem for projects that use HTML5 canvas, can't use excanvas.js with the Silverlight patch, but do need to serve up JS-powered charts to clients still on IE6/IE7.
- shykes 17y agoSIMILE's Timeplot (http://www.simile-widgets.org/timeplot/ http://www.simile-widgets.org/timeplot/) is great but more specialized. Great for browsing huge datasets.
- gruseom 17y agoI'll have to look more into this library. I'm glad to see it uses SVG and VML (edit: oops - plus Canvas). That seems like the right fit for this problem, since SVG and VML have pretty close models and that way you can have native vector graphics in all browsers. Edit 2: I have a question. Are the charts on the Demo page drawing so slowly because of someone's clever idea of an animation? Or does the library actually draw that slowly?
- cyen 17y agoI've explore a bunch of JS libraries in the past - here are some thoughts: Flot and Flotr are definitely past favorites, and its usage has felt the most natural PlotKit (http://www.liquidx.net/plotkit/ http://www.liquidx.net/plotkit/) - MochiKit-based, visually nice but not as well documented or, apparently, nearly as extensive as some of the other options RGraph - an HTML5 canvas library, but pretty basic and definitely easy the least visually appealing Highcharts definitely looks like it has the nicest animations of any of the previous ones, and also definitely has the best documentation / demo gallery. Thumbs up - definitely coming this way the next time I need a nice graphing library!
- iamwil 17y agoplotkit is kinda nice, but you can't plot multiple lines on the same graph well. You can, but by default, it distinguishes between different lines by coloring the area underneath it. And when you do, it's all opaque. If you try to color the lines themselves, it turns ugly.
- tom_b 17y agoBullet graphs and sparklines as default chart options please? After Tufte and Few, I basically look for these first when evaluating any chart library.
- nym 17y agoLike this? http://omnipotent.net/jquery.sparkline/ http://omnipotent.net/jquery.sparkline/
- akronim 17y agoNice, but pretty slow to render for me (on FF3.5). Actually it's more that it pauses at about one quarter rendered and looks broken for a second before it finally renders.
- freetard 17y agoI prefer http://www.jqplot.com/ http://www.jqplot.com/ it's free and open source.
- va_coder 17y agoI recommend Fusion charts free (and opensource) (it's flash though)
- revorad 17y agoHas anyone used the paid versions of Highcharts or any others mentioned in this thread? What do you think of the Highcharts price points - $80 for single commercial site, $360 for multiple sites? I'm working on a graphing app too and trying to decide my pricing.
- alex_c 17y agoAt first glance, it looks sleek, polished, and feature-rich. Not sure yet if we'll need charts for the project I'm currently working on, but if we do, we'll definitely consider it - $80 sounds reasonable.
- smiler 17y agoIt's very cheap but then you get what you pay for. The best and fully featured graphing capabilities are from Dundas imo (www.dundas.com). They charge about $3000 / developer licence and then $3000 / server that you run it on. If you priced it somewhere between the two and it had a good feature set I might bite. It would have to support printing though (and generating a PDF would be a big plus)
- revorad 17y agoThanks for the info, smiler. I can tell you PDF will definitely be there, so printing will follow. It would be helpful if you could share more about your use cases. Dundas looks mainly aimed at .Net development; is that what you need it for? Email me at hrishimittal@gmail.com and I'll put you on our early adopters discount list.
- smiler 17y agoUse cases are pretty simple - building reports for MIS, corporate systems etc... all of them use Windows servers so asp.net is the standard for development hence Dundas
- revorad 17y agoOK. Well, I won't promise too much but would be happy to help you try out our initial offering. Feel free to email me or look out for my Ask HN review post in the next few weeks. Cheers!
- smiler 17y agoPrint a graph and you get a blank space. Useless
- leonh 17y agoYou should really take a look at Ajax.org, they show some of the smoothest interactive 3D javascript plots i have ever seen. I have just submitted it in the new section. http://www.ajax.org/public/presentation/tae/presentation2.html http://www.ajax.org/public/presentation/tae/presentation2.ht...
- hadley 17y agoWhy does doesn't suck = as good as excel?
- adriand 17y agoSurprised no one has mentioned Emprise yet. http://ejschart.com/ http://ejschart.com/ Their website is not the nicest but their charts are very good, also pure Javascript, and their pricing is reasonable. We've used the library with success in a couple of projects.
- ig1 17y agoThe problem with all these graphing libraries is that it's non-trivial to post the graphs elsewhere. If you have a data driven website then your users are going to want to share your graphs on facebook, twitter, forums. If you don't make it easy you're giving away a huge amount of free traffic.
- albertni 17y agoMaybe this is asking too much, but I'm seeing a ton of different recommendations in the comments - anyone have experience with many (or at least more than one) of these options and wouldn't mind going into some of the differences that stood out to them? I've Googled in the past but haven't found too many great reviews comparing some of these choices side-by-side - most seem to regurgitate the feature sets as opposed to going into the level of detail that would be most helpful for a developer.
- euroclydon 17y agoI'm looking for multiple, as in more than two, independent y-axis.
- sjs382 17y agoFlot is capable of this: http://people.iola.dk/olau/flot/examples/dual-axis.html http://people.iola.dk/olau/flot/examples/dual-axis.html
- euroclydon 17y agoThank example show only two, but the text seems to say you can do more.
- chasingsparks 17y agoThe splines are nice: http://www.highcharts.com/demo/?example=spline-symbols&theme=default http://www.highcharts.com/demo/?example=spline-symbols&t...
- rjurney 17y agoAnyone got a good JS map chart?
- xtho 17y agoThe charts in the demo section look uglier than Excel charts.
- bravura 17y agoI think the charts in the demo section look good, save for the unfortunate choices of bland yet mismatched colors (http://www.highcharts.com/demo/?example=area-stacked-percent&theme=default http://www.highcharts.com/demo/?example=area-stacked-percent...). I would prefer bland but matched colors.
- rmanocha 17y agoI've been using Google's Visualization API's for my latest work and I've been really happy with it. The API is in JS but I believe there are hooks for Python and other languages too. http://code.google.com/apis/visualization/ http://code.google.com/apis/visualization/