Yeah, that one, versus the other 97% of other climate scientists who complain that her work is BS and that she has purposely misinterpreted the findings and con

Yeah, that one, versus the other 97% of other climate scientists who complain that her work is BS and that she has purposely misinterpreted the findings and conclusions of the IPCC reports. Your idea that this is an ad hominem is intellectually dishonest. Curry has been criticized by the vast, vast majority of climate scientists for her outrageous and ignorant interpolation of other climate data. Finally, there is nothing "weird" about people who are quacks publishing things on Nature. Nature is not the end-all of scientific publications, and it's not by any means a specialty publication in the field of climate science.