4 ms·

Apple Maps Vehicles

20 points by qzervaas 11y ago

kyriakos 11y ago
I believe this is completely unnecessary. Not that competition is not good but in this case they are just wasting money that could have otherwise been used to innovate in something else.
- Nicholas_C 11y ago
  Really? Street level images are something Apple needs if they want to be a true contender with maps. Maps apps are some of the most used apps and it's in Apple's best interest to be up to speed with competition so users won't just use Google maps and form a gap in the Apple ecosystem.
- joezydeco 11y ago
  Like, perhaps, a car?
- mikhailt 11y ago
  Majority of what Apple does is completely unnecessary. They do it because they want to provide the best integration they can. And they have ~180 billion in cash collecting nothing but interests. I'm sure the interests alone are paying for these "unnecessary" expenses.
Nicholas_C 11y ago
I'm surprised there aren't any companies already doing this and selling the data to the street level image newcomers.
- heimatau 11y ago
  That would be a nice business but it has a high entry point and a short life overall. Also, doing the same thing, the same way, that competitors have done is foolish. Maybe if there was a model where people could submit their drives with a gopro or something. Then the model would be a middleman for the data.
  - Nicholas_C 11y ago
    >That would be a nice business but it has a high entry point and a short life overall. High entry point = lack of competitors. As for the short life: New development is always occurring, meaning up to date images will always be needed. These cars could also be contracted out to real estate firms to take up to date photos of neighborhoods where new development is proposed. >Also, doing the same thing, the same way, that competitors have done is foolish. They've done the hard part and validated and created the market for street level photos. I wouldn't consider Google, Bing, and Apple as competitors unless they sell their street level data. Perhaps they do, then I would be uninterested. This business model wouldn't be the same as Google, Bing, and Apple either. They are using street images to create a better UX for maps. This idea would be using street images to sell to enterprises who would then use this data for whatever purposes. B2C vs. B2B.
  - beering 11y ago
    Check out Mapillary. Crowd-sourced street-level imagery. Not really comparable to professionally captured imagery imo.
- drewvolpe 11y ago
  One of GigWalk's first big customers was a deal with Microsoft to capture images of storefronts for Bing Maps: http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/techflash/2011/07/gigwalk-partners-with-bing.html http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/techflash/2011/07/gi...
- beering 11y ago
  HERE Maps (of Nokia) does street level imagery plus lidar data. Apple could have licensed their data.

20 points by qzervaas 11y ago

I believe this is completely unnecessary. Not that competition is not good but in this case they are just wasting money that could have otherwise been used to innovate in something else.

Nicholas_C 11y ago
Really? Street level images are something Apple needs if they want to be a true contender with maps. Maps apps are some of the most used apps and it's in Apple's best interest to be up to speed with competition so users won't just use Google maps and form a gap in the Apple ecosystem.
joezydeco 11y ago
Like, perhaps, a car?
mikhailt 11y ago
Majority of what Apple does is completely unnecessary. They do it because they want to provide the best integration they can. And they have ~180 billion in cash collecting nothing but interests. I'm sure the interests alone are paying for these "unnecessary" expenses.

Nicholas_C 11y ago

I'm surprised there aren't any companies already doing this and selling the data to the street level image newcomers.

heimatau 11y ago
That would be a nice business but it has a high entry point and a short life overall. Also, doing the same thing, the same way, that competitors have done is foolish. Maybe if there was a model where people could submit their drives with a gopro or something. Then the model would be a middleman for the data.
- Nicholas_C 11y ago
  >That would be a nice business but it has a high entry point and a short life overall. High entry point = lack of competitors. As for the short life: New development is always occurring, meaning up to date images will always be needed. These cars could also be contracted out to real estate firms to take up to date photos of neighborhoods where new development is proposed. >Also, doing the same thing, the same way, that competitors have done is foolish. They've done the hard part and validated and created the market for street level photos. I wouldn't consider Google, Bing, and Apple as competitors unless they sell their street level data. Perhaps they do, then I would be uninterested. This business model wouldn't be the same as Google, Bing, and Apple either. They are using street images to create a better UX for maps. This idea would be using street images to sell to enterprises who would then use this data for whatever purposes. B2C vs. B2B.
- beering 11y ago
  Check out Mapillary. Crowd-sourced street-level imagery. Not really comparable to professionally captured imagery imo.
drewvolpe 11y ago
One of GigWalk's first big customers was a deal with Microsoft to capture images of storefronts for Bing Maps: http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/techflash/2011/07/gigwalk-partners-with-bing.html http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/techflash/2011/07/gi...
beering 11y ago
HERE Maps (of Nokia) does street level imagery plus lidar data. Apple could have licensed their data.