2 ms·
Yes. This is true. I mean wealth in terms of wealth ownership. Compounding interest from loans, dividends, or stock investments causes the amount of wealth "own
by crimsonalucard 11y ago
Yes. This is true. I mean wealth in terms of wealth ownership. Compounding interest from loans, dividends, or stock investments causes the amount of wealth "owned" by rich people to grow unnaturally.
- adventured 11y agoThere's nothing unnatural about yielding a return on an investment. The greatest contributor to wealth inequality in the last 40 years is the Federal Reserve debasing the currency that the middle class depends on (and since ~1970, they've been doing it at a very rapid clip). If your wages go up 2% per year, and inflation averages 3% per year, over 30 years your standard of living is going to get nuked. The super rich can manage inflation by shifting assets, everyone else cannot.
- crimsonalucard 11y agoIn the natural state of things, one does work and in doing work one gains roughly equal wealth in exchange for an equal amount of work. Yielding compounding returns on investments with little risk is gaining wealth for no work. That is unnatural. What is more unnatural is when an obscenely rich person earns a million a year as a return on investments. A million dollars in wealth in one year is usually not equivalent to the output of one man. Multiple people must work together to generate that amount of GDP. So how does a rich man procure the wealth equivalent to the work of multitudes of people without contributing any work himself? He must do so in a way that is unnatural.