3 ms·
No, this is the set of raw data beneath the corrected data all the papers are based on. It isn't Darwin's notebook, it is the set of species that Darwin studied
by krschultz 17y ago
No, this is the set of raw data beneath the corrected data all the papers are based on. It isn't Darwin's notebook, it is the set of species that Darwin studied. If you removed all the fossils and a lot of the species and tried to prove evolution you'd be in the same ball park as what is going on here.
- timr 17y ago"No, this is the set of raw data beneath the corrected data all the papers are based on." No, it's not. First, no reputable journal allows re-publication of the same data set -- after thousands of publications, it's just silly to suggest that it's all based on the same data. Second, even if you don't believe that other scientists would prevent the re-publication of the same data, one only has to peruse the IPCC report to see that there's a lot more than just the "hockey stick" graph and computer models.