Seriously! How this was done was wrong. SF writes: "Mirrored projects are sometimes used to deliver easy-to-decline third-party offers, and the original downl

Seriously! How this was done was wrong. SF writes: "Mirrored projects are sometimes used to deliver easy-to-decline third-party offers, and the original downloads are always available." It's wrong because it's disingenuous - an insincere representation of the GIMP maintainers package, to include adware in the package. SF insufficiently differentiates this "gimp-win" project with the small, coded byline: "Brought to you by: sf-editor1" (http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimp-win/files/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimp-win/files/) Let's be blatant and honest: this is "SF-GIMP" not GIMP. It's being operated here under the guise of the authors and currently not sufficiently identified as a fork. SF skirts "adoption responsibility" by simply writing a post to some unrelated blog article after the fact and create a collection of unrelated "deceptive ad blocking" website tools. RECOMMENDATIONS TO SF: * Be up front and bold about "adopting"! * Free software or not this adoption stinks!