3 ms·
Ok so, if we know the 1960+ tree ring data is bad, why do we continue to assume it was good before that point? What changed in 1960 that 'invalidates' the tree
by seedy 17y ago
Ok so, if we know the 1960+ tree ring data is bad, why do we continue to assume it was good before that point? What changed in 1960 that 'invalidates' the tree ring data?