5 ms·
Well that'd be research code anyway :) You'd probably better off rebuilding from scratch based on the research paper. The software shouldn't be that complicated
by iXce 11y ago
Well that'd be research code anyway :)
You'd probably better off rebuilding from scratch based on the research paper.
The software shouldn't be that complicated in the end, the main challenge (to me) is gathering that 86M images dataset.
- stared 11y agoResearch code is infinitely better than no code. Research papers are almost never complete enough to reimplement it (seriously - I met a lot of academicians doing it, and most of the time it was not possible without contacting authors; just - text does not compile). Vide: http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/23237/why-are-papers-without-code-but-with-results-accepted http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/23237/why-are-pa... http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/37370/should-i-share-my-horrible-software http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/37370/should-i-s... (A similar things holds for data as well.)