4 ms·
With all such results there is one question: are they releasing code? Otherwise... it's a nice demo to watch, but impossible to use (and even: hard to increment
by stared 11y ago
With all such results there is one question: are they releasing code? Otherwise... it's a nice demo to watch, but impossible to use (and even: hard to increment on it).
- iXce 11y agoWell that'd be research code anyway :) You'd probably better off rebuilding from scratch based on the research paper. The software shouldn't be that complicated in the end, the main challenge (to me) is gathering that 86M images dataset.
- stared 11y agoResearch code is infinitely better than no code. Research papers are almost never complete enough to reimplement it (seriously - I met a lot of academicians doing it, and most of the time it was not possible without contacting authors; just - text does not compile). Vide: http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/23237/why-are-papers-without-code-but-with-results-accepted http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/23237/why-are-pa... http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/37370/should-i-share-my-horrible-software http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/37370/should-i-s... (A similar things holds for data as well.)
- roryokane 11y ago> Upcoming > Code and more results will be published soon.