6 ms·

I'd be really curious to hear feedback from anyone that has used this. I'm currently using dspam and still deal with a lot of spam hitting my inbox.

• vizzah 11y ago
  I use ASSP and even without Bayesian filters (which I don't like for too many false positives) have only an occasional phishing e-mail in my numerous inboxes, even with e-mail addresses published on sites.
• OrNix 11y ago
  Easy to use, fast and flexible antispam.
• spacenerf 11y ago
  I've been using it on my own machine for a while and have used it for ingress/egress filtering at a small ISP (handling ~5k emails/day). Accuracy is reasonably good & it's very light. If there's something more particular you want to know ask away. ;)
• darklajid 11y ago
  I'm a happy dspam user (most stuff won't reach me), but looked into this one in the past. Reasons for me not to give it a try: - Rule based mostly (which I think of as 'SA') - No db support, as far as I could tell. My dspam keeps everything in a postgresql db and I can easily backup/restore that with all my other stuff (dovecot/postfix virtual users, for example) - ~Easy~ to integrate into anything. Look for 'how can I make dovecot-antispam integrate with dspam' and that's been done a thousand times (and works nicely). I haven't found a decent number of rspam resources That said: My whole post basically says that I didn't try it (for reasons that were important to me). Their site looks interesting and in the end I guess I'd love to hear about successful dspam->rspam migrations as well.
  • scott_karana 11y ago
    > - No db support, as far as I could tell. My dspam keeps everything in a postgresql db and I can easily backup/restore that with all my other stuff (dovecot/postfix virtual users, for example) Rspamd appears to use sqlite3: https://rspamd.com/doc/workers/fuzzy_storage.html https://rspamd.com/doc/workers/fuzzy_storage.html
    • darklajid 11y ago
      Hey. Thanks, but.. That's not quite what I had in mind. For one, somedb-only (sqlite or anything else) is usually not enough. I would hesitate to introduce a system that just supports mysql when everything else is using postgresql for me, for example. And on top of that, this schema is .. limited. My dspam setup learns and can do that for each and every user (though system wide training seems to be the norm, as far as I can tell). This is really just a storage engine as far as I can tell and not really comparable. That said: I guess I would give rspam a try if I saw a lot of positive reviews/reports. It's just that it certainly doesn't do the same thing as dspam. It's quite a different animal.
  • jwise0 11y ago
    I was a very happy dspam user for about three days -- SpamAssassin's accuracy on my setup is terrible, and dspam performed pretty well (and increasingly so with training). Then, dspam started segfaulting, and none of my e-mail was delivered. I looked into what was going on, and it appeared that the dspam hash database had somehow become corrupted; and since dspam is completely unmaintained these days, it was unlikely that whatever bug I tripped upon would ever be fixed. Sigh. I also would like to hear user reports about rspamd! I am getting sick of the false negative rate that I'm getting from SpamAssassin.
• rennpferd 11y ago
  Works like a charm, my setup is postfix + dovecot + rmilter + rspamd.
  • zobzu 11y ago
    seems like the perfect setup du jour, should probably document it :)
    • rennpferd 11y ago
      Yeah, should've documented it while I was setting it up...