2 ms·
Conservation of momentum can be derived as a necessary result in any theory whose basic laws are translation invariant (that is, if the defining equations are u
by Steuard 11y ago
Conservation of momentum can be derived as a necessary result in any theory whose basic laws are translation invariant (that is, if the defining equations are unchanged if you move everything in the universe 6.2 cubits to the left). This is true in classical physics, relativistic dynamics, quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, or even string theory). You can prove it in various ways depending on which formalism you're working in, but the most elegant proofs I know are based on Noether's Theorem (http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/noether.html http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/noether.html). It's beautifully general, and it applies equally strongly to classical or quantum systems.
- api 11y agoMust it be local conservation? In other words can we rule out systems that push against something nonlocal or against everything in the universe at once? Edit: elsewhere in the thread you explain that yes, it must be local. So if this isn't experimental error or some other minor effect, it seems safe to assume that however it works it is not violating conservation of momentum. Either that or the universe is much weirder than we thought.