3 ms·
I was going to post that this would have been cool a year ago, but now that MongoDB has interchangeable backends there's not much to gain from a high level proj
by tinco 12y ago
I was going to post that this would have been cool a year ago, but now that MongoDB has interchangeable backends there's not much to gain from a high level project like this.
But then I saw that this project started two years ago, and the last commit was a year ago.
- worldsayshi 12y ago| MongoDB has interchangeable backends Do you have a source on this? I can't find anything at the moment but it sounds familiar.
- bryanlarsen 12y agoThe feature is called "pluggable storage engine", if you want something to Google.
- worldsayshi 12y agoYup, found it: http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/release-notes/3.0/#pluggable-storage-engine-api http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/release-notes/3.0/#pluggable-...
- justinsb 12y agoFrom my experience of MySQL's pluggable engines, I learned that this actually complicates things: the user interface ends up being awkward, optimization is harder, adding features is made much harder. Investigating standalone alternatives therefore seems like a good thing, even for projects starting today.