4 ms·
>As an upper performance bound for a GC language, I don't think Go will be able to surpass C# I don't know how well Mono C# compares to Microsoft's version, bu
by gillianseed 12y ago
>As an upper performance bound for a GC language, I don't think Go will be able to surpass C#
I don't know how well Mono C# compares to Microsoft's version, but looking at:
http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=go&lang2=csharp&data=u64q http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?t...
Shows that Go certainly beats Mono #C in these benchmarks (often by a very wide margin).
From a technical standpoint I don't see any reason why Go would not be faster than C#, how would 'ahead of time compilation' bring C# a performance benefit over Go ?
- seanmcdirmid 12y agoMono is considered slow in the .net world. Lets hope the new stance on open source makes things better. Go and C# are dealing with similar constraints, there is no language design advantage in go with respect to performance, and the resources applied to implementation are similar.