3 ms·
Same here. I recently found out about Babashka [0] and Declarative Bash [1], but I've written something similar already. It's much easier to find talent that kn
by kolev 12y ago
Same here. I recently found out about Babashka [0] and Declarative Bash [1], but I've written something similar already. It's much easier to find talent that knows Bash and can learn a readable library of Bash scripts within a day vs finding talent that knows the flavor of the day (every year people are migrating from the old favor to the new - Bash => CFEngine => Pupper => Chef => Salt => Ansible => ... => Bash).
[0] https://github.com/richo/babashka https://github.com/richo/babashka
[1] https://github.com/threatgrid/declarative.bash https://github.com/threatgrid/declarative.bash
P.S. I've recently been fascinated by Rex [2] (They should fix their text logo though - I find it terrible).
[2] http://www.rexify.org/ http://www.rexify.org/
- e12e 12y agoFirst I thought this was some dialect of Rexx[1], but then I saw: "Easy to learn, it's just plain Perl". A well. No thank you, I'll stick with ansible. Not that I think Rexx would be a good idea either, it just reminded me of ARexx for AmigaOS... [ed: forgot to ask: you find it easy to find talent that can not only learn some bash script library, but write new code without introducing some gaping hole somewhere?] [1] http://www.rexxla.org/ http://www.rexxla.org/
- kolev 12y agoI'm sorry, but with Rex you don't use much of Perl. It's a DSL, which is based on Perl.