3 ms·
I'm interested in what the licensing will be like, compared to "larger" editions.
by scott_karana 12y ago
I'm interested in what the licensing will be like, compared to "larger" editions.
- brixon 12y agoI hope it will cost a lot less. Might interesting for the C# people to use non-Azure clouds more if the costs are more inline with Linux based systems.
- mmgutz 12y agoasp.vnext is targeting Linux. My guess is those who will run on other clouds will likely use Linux/container*OS instead.
- Someone1234 12y agoWith MVC moving to a Linux compatible infrastructure in the next version, it may be too little too late, and C# people might just use Linux for real. Literally the only C# "thing" which won't run on Linux is Visual Studio itself. Heck we might even see a Linux Powershell version here in the next few years.
- algorithmsRcool 12y agoNot quite, WPF and winforms are still out in the cold along with some other things. But for sever-side code, .net core + asp.net will get the job done.
- pjmlp 12y agoWe never had any issues deploying .NET applications in Amazon.
- brk 12y agoIMO the licensing needs to be free and very simple. For me, this has always been one of the HUGE benefits of linux. If I have an idea I can spin up a full server stack (OS, SQL, HTTPD, etc.) for $0 (outside of hardware/hosting). With linux there is no friction you need to overcome in determining if the cost of trying something out is worth the financial side. The elastic hosting options take away a lot of this, but there is still (to me at least) this mental barrier to Windows in knowing that I might run into licensing costs or administration issues before I determine if the project itself is worth said cost.