5 ms·
Deployment one-liners with hashpipe will only work if hashpipe is installed, which would be equally difficult for users to install properly than the software it
by vortico 12y ago
Deployment one-liners with hashpipe will only work if hashpipe is installed, which would be equally difficult for users to install properly than the software itself. Then you'd need something like this:
> Simply install using `curl hashpi.pe | bash`
- deevus 12y agoHah. Nice one :)
- RegEx 12y agoThis is a really, really interesting point! In addition to your point, (and perhaps this point has already been made elsewhere in the thread), but the type of people that would install hashpipe would be the kind of people to avoid the practice entirely. Perhaps there's some mechanism for convincing people to use the tool, and if that mechanism ends up being easier than convincing people to stop piping directly to bash, it sounds like it would be worth pursuing :)
- _prometheus 12y agoyeah, this is just a stopgap for me. in the end i want: ipfs daemon --mount & sh /ipfs/QmTpnQL97XEHmyt54mgEwf5BN8gJWvw4sGgwQzjqtBwLX6 (this actually works, btw :)
- e12e 12y agoThank's for pimpong ipfs -- I hadn't heard of it before. Initial discussion on hn: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8069836 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8069836 github(?): https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs Recent re-submission of new(?) home page: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9321209 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9321209
- Nullabillity 12y agoWell, it'd be easier to get hashpipe into all the typical package managers than to get every piece of software ever into them (though that way would of course be preferable).