4 ms·
True, but it's a dangerous precedent. The fact is that a lot of law in areas such as traffic, waste management etc is basically meant to be fluid and a deterren
by hipsters_unite 12y ago
True, but it's a dangerous precedent. The fact is that a lot of law in areas such as traffic, waste management etc is basically meant to be fluid and a deterrent; if everybody that littered where it was illegal, drank from open containers where it was illegal, fly-tipped or sped was instantly caught, then we'd just have tonnes of people in prison for relatively minor offences.
I think there's a desirable degree of pragmatism to be favoured in lieu of unbounded technological utopianism on this point.
- TeMPOraL 12y agoYou don't (shouldn't) put people in prison for stuff like this, you keep fining them increasing amounts of money until they stop doing the thing they are not supposed to be doing. The world would be a much better place if the traffic (and waste) laws were more, maybe even automatically, enforced.
- leohutson 12y agoI think a point system is better than fines. Fines are effective deterrents for most people, but they are unfair on the poor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_system_%28driving%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_system_%28driving%29
- TeMPOraL 12y agoYou could also have fines proportional to income. Both fines and point systems have their caveats though.
- ghshephard 12y agoCase in point: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/singaporean-man-fined-15k-littering-34-cigarette-butts-article-1.2089316 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/singaporean-man-fined-...